Abstract:BACKGROUND: Blood-based proteomic profiling may aid and expand our understanding of diseases and their different phenotypes. The aim of the presented study was to profile serum samples from patients with malignant melanoma using affinity proteomic assays to describe proteins in the blood stream that are associated to stage or recurrence of melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multiplexed protein analysis was conducted using antibody suspension bead arrays. A total of 232 antibodies against 132 proteins were selecte… Show more
“…The search for biomarkers of melanoma progression and response to therapy including recent genomics or other “omics” approaches has led to the discovery of numerous promising proteins (reviewed in (Gowda et al., 2020; Rodriguez‐Cerdeira et al., 2018)). However, none of these potential biomarkers have been validated so far, and only soluble lactic dehydrogenase (sLDH) remains as the protein that correlates with the disease burden in some patients with metastatic melanoma (Byström et al., 2017). Recent attempts at establishing correlations between levels of sLDH and any specific molecular, immunological or metabolic phenotypes, including immune cell infiltrate in the tumour, point mutations, DNA copy number, promoter methylation, RNA expression or protein expression in melanoma metastases have been not been successful (Gowda et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors known to be involved in angiogenesis, immune suppression, modification of stroma, capture of cancer cells in lymph nodes and tumour cell progression have been identified in sEV from the plasma of melanoma patients by us and others (Alegre et al., 2016; Gowda et al., 2020; Hood, 2019; Sharma et al., 2020). Several previous studies suggested that the use of EV, especially tumour cell‐derived sEV (TEX), might be a more promising approach to the discovery and development of melanoma‐associated biomarkers than strategies dependent on conventional tumour tissue examination or on measuring levels of soluble factors in patients’ plasma (Byström et al., 2017; Rodriguez‐Cerdeira et al., 2018; The TCGA Research Network).…”
Molecular profiling of small extracellular vesicles (sEV) isolated from plasma of cancer patients emerges as promising strategy for biomarkers discovery. We investigated the proteomic profiles of sEV immunoselected using anti‐CSPG4 antibodies from 15 melanoma patients’ plasma. The proteomes of sEV separated into melanoma cell‐derived (MTEX) and non‐malignant cell‐derived (NMTEX) were compared using high‐resolution mass spectrometry. Paired analysis identified the MTEX‐associated profile of 16 proteins that discriminated MTEX from NMETEX. We also identified the MTEX profile that discriminated between seven patients with no evidence of melanoma (NED) after therapy and eight with progressive disease (PD). Among 75 MTEX proteins overexpressed in PD patients, PDCD6IP (ALIX) had the highest discriminating value, while CNTN1 (contactin‐1) was upregulated only in MTEX of NED patients. This is the first report documenting that proteomes of tumour‐derived sEV in patients’ plasma discriminate cancer from non‐cancer and identify proteins with potential to serve as prognostic biomarkers in melanoma.
“…The search for biomarkers of melanoma progression and response to therapy including recent genomics or other “omics” approaches has led to the discovery of numerous promising proteins (reviewed in (Gowda et al., 2020; Rodriguez‐Cerdeira et al., 2018)). However, none of these potential biomarkers have been validated so far, and only soluble lactic dehydrogenase (sLDH) remains as the protein that correlates with the disease burden in some patients with metastatic melanoma (Byström et al., 2017). Recent attempts at establishing correlations between levels of sLDH and any specific molecular, immunological or metabolic phenotypes, including immune cell infiltrate in the tumour, point mutations, DNA copy number, promoter methylation, RNA expression or protein expression in melanoma metastases have been not been successful (Gowda et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors known to be involved in angiogenesis, immune suppression, modification of stroma, capture of cancer cells in lymph nodes and tumour cell progression have been identified in sEV from the plasma of melanoma patients by us and others (Alegre et al., 2016; Gowda et al., 2020; Hood, 2019; Sharma et al., 2020). Several previous studies suggested that the use of EV, especially tumour cell‐derived sEV (TEX), might be a more promising approach to the discovery and development of melanoma‐associated biomarkers than strategies dependent on conventional tumour tissue examination or on measuring levels of soluble factors in patients’ plasma (Byström et al., 2017; Rodriguez‐Cerdeira et al., 2018; The TCGA Research Network).…”
Molecular profiling of small extracellular vesicles (sEV) isolated from plasma of cancer patients emerges as promising strategy for biomarkers discovery. We investigated the proteomic profiles of sEV immunoselected using anti‐CSPG4 antibodies from 15 melanoma patients’ plasma. The proteomes of sEV separated into melanoma cell‐derived (MTEX) and non‐malignant cell‐derived (NMTEX) were compared using high‐resolution mass spectrometry. Paired analysis identified the MTEX‐associated profile of 16 proteins that discriminated MTEX from NMETEX. We also identified the MTEX profile that discriminated between seven patients with no evidence of melanoma (NED) after therapy and eight with progressive disease (PD). Among 75 MTEX proteins overexpressed in PD patients, PDCD6IP (ALIX) had the highest discriminating value, while CNTN1 (contactin‐1) was upregulated only in MTEX of NED patients. This is the first report documenting that proteomes of tumour‐derived sEV in patients’ plasma discriminate cancer from non‐cancer and identify proteins with potential to serve as prognostic biomarkers in melanoma.
“…This method has previously been applied in both pediatric and adult cohorts in other contexts such as childhood asthma and malaria, [12,30] liver and kidney disease, [11,31] nervous system/neurodegenerative disease, [32,33] and cancer. [34] Although our study included a large number of children, the number of children per lifestyle group was too small to allow for analysis stratified by exposure, such as vaccination and breast feeding or outcome such as sensitization to allergens. An association with sex in the development of plasma proteins cannot be ruled out; however, the proportions of females and males were reasonably balanced, also between the lifestyle groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has previously been applied in both pediatric and adult cohorts in other contexts such as childhood asthma and malaria, [ 12,30 ] liver and kidney disease, [ 11,31 ] nervous system/neurodegenerative disease, [ 32,33 ] and cancer. [ 34 ]…”
Purpose: Little is known about the longitudinal development of different plasma protein levels during early childhood and particularly in relation to lifestyle factors. This study aimed to monitor the plasma proteome early in life and the influence of different lifestyles. Experimental Design: A multiplex bead-based immunoassay was used to analyze plasma levels of 97 proteins in 280 blood samples longitudinally collected in children at 6, 12, 24, and 60 months of age living in families with an anthroposophic (n = 15), partly anthroposophic (n = 27), or non-anthroposophic (n = 28) lifestyle.Results: A total of 68 proteins (70%) showed significantly altered plasma levels between 6 months and 5 years of age. In lifestyle stratified analysis, 59 of 97 (61%) proteins were altered over time within one or more of the three lifestyle groups. Nearly half of these proteins (28 out of 59) changed irrespective of lifestyle. The temporal changes represented four longitudinal trends of the plasma proteins during development, also following stratification of lifestyle.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance:Our findings contribute to understand the development of the plasma proteome under the influence of lifestyle exposures in early childhood.
“…The expression of S100A6 was described in cutaneous and extracutaneous lesion including melanocytic nevi and malignant melanoma [179]. S100A6 is overexpressed in Spitz nevi, melanocytic nevi, and melanomas [160]; in fact, tissue analysis of melanoma patients revealed that most melanomas showed positive staining for S100A6 [161]. Interestingly, many studies have suggested a role of S100A6 in metastasis, although the exact metastatic mechanism is not specified.…”
Despite recent progresses in its treatment, malignant cutaneous melanoma remains a cancer with very poor prognosis. Emerging evidences suggest that the receptor for advance glycation end products (RAGE) plays a key role in melanoma progression through its activation in both cancer and stromal cells. In tumors, RAGE activation is fueled by numerous ligands, S100B and HMGB1 being the most notable, but the role of many other ligands is not well understood and should not be underappreciated. Here, we provide a review of the current role of RAGE in melanoma and conclude that targeting RAGE in melanoma could be an approach to improve the outcomes of melanoma patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.