Procedings of the Machine Vision of Animals and Their Behaviour Workshop 2015 2015
DOI: 10.5244/c.29.mvab.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affinity Matting for Pixel-accurate Fin Shape Recovery from Great White Shark Imagery

Abstract: The objective of this paper is to obtain pixel-accurate reconstructions of white shark fins given automatically generated coarse pre-segmentations. Reconstruction performance is compared for affinity matting, colour matting and GrabCut against expert annotated ground truth for a test-set of 120 fin images taken in the wild. For the present domain, we find affinity matting able to most accurately recover fine shape details, whilst being robust to wide baseline trimap initialisations as needed to reconstruct pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtain a binary assignment of pixels (by threshold 0.5) to separate fin and background, and extract the resulting high resolution contour of best Chamfer distance fit as a precursor to biometric encoding. Full details of this edge refinement procedure can be found in Hughes and Burghardt (2015a).…”
Section: Biometric Contour Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain a binary assignment of pixels (by threshold 0.5) to separate fin and background, and extract the resulting high resolution contour of best Chamfer distance fit as a precursor to biometric encoding. Full details of this edge refinement procedure can be found in Hughes and Burghardt (2015a).…”
Section: Biometric Contour Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used as an effective technique for data collection in ecological procedures such as capture-mark-recapture (CMR), as photographic images of an individual’s unique markings can be cross-matched within a photo-database for detection of recapture events ( Williams, Nichols & Conroy, 2002 ; Pebsworth & Lafleur, 2014 ). This process has been particularly useful for monitoring species that cannot be easily captured or artificially tagged for identification purposes ( Frisch & Hobbs, 2007 ; Arandjelović & Zisserman, 2011 ; Hughes & Burghardt, 2015 ), and has been applied to a diverse number of taxa including mammals ( Karanth & Nichols, 1998 ), large fish ( Arandjelović & Zisserman, 2011 ; Hughes & Burghardt, 2015 ), crustaceans ( Frisch & Hobbs, 2007 ), and herpetofauna ( Gardiner et al, 2014 ). With the increased affordability and use of smartphone devices that are equipped with cameras, as well as the advent of camera trapping technology, individuals can now be photographed under field conditions and differentiated with very little cost, logistics or expertise required ( Wagner et al, 2008 ; Haddock, Kim & Mukai, 2013 ; Pebsworth & Lafleur, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%