Affective responses to different prescriptions of high-intensity interval exercise in hypertensive patients

Lins-Filho, Ozeas L; Ritti‐Dias, Raphael Mendes; Santos, Tony Meireles; Silva, Jessica F; Leite, Giselly F; Gusmão, Luana S; Ferreira, Daniela Karina da Silva

doi:10.23736/s0022-4707.19.10155-7

Cited by 4 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In terms of reducing rest HR, HVHIIT is the best, and blank is the worst. A study by Lins-Filho et al (49), reported that SBP did not change significantly in HIIT and blank groups, but with a slight increase in SBP when the measurement time was taken 60 min after exercise. The transient increase in blood pressure from the exercise did not fully recover after rest.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…All of the 12 studies reported on SBP and 11 of them showed that SBP levels decreased significantly compared with the baseline, after a period of exercise training (p < 0.05) (38,39,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)53), only 1 study showed no significant change in SBP levels after exercise (p > 0.05) (54). Of the 9 studies reported on DBP (38,39,44,46,47,(49)(50)(51)54), only 1 study showed no significant change in DBP after exercise (p > 0.05) (49), and the other 8 studies showed DBP decreased significantly after the exercise. Subsequently, 6 studies reported on BMI (38,47,48,50,51,53), and only 2 studies showed a significant decrease in BMI after exercise (38,47,48).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Subsequently, 6 studies reported on BMI (38,47,48,50,51,53), and only 2 studies showed a significant decrease in BMI after exercise (38,47,48). Based on 8 studies reported on rest HR (38,39,(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)54), 6 studies showed rest HR decreased after exercise (38,39,47,48,50,54), and 2 studies showed rest HR did not change significantly after exercise (46,49). However, in the study by Lins-Filho et al, rest HR decreased significantly in the blank control group (49).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 3 of the four studies in subjects aged from 51.08 to 78 years old, their blood pressure and/or health status improved significantly after a period of physical exercise (45,46,48), and only one study had no statistically significant change in blood pressure after receiving HIIT intervention (49). For the study with subjects who received only eight HIIT interventions, the blood pressure was measured 60 min after each intervention, the insignificant change may be due to the short cycle of the intervention, whereby the blood pressure did not return to the resting level after exercise.…”

Section: Agementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, among the 12 studies included, 9 used treadmills or power bicycles to test the maximum heart rate, maximum oxygen uptake, or maximum power (38,39,(44)(45)(46)(47)(48) of the subjects, and 1 study used sub-maximum oxygen uptake to estimate maximum oxygen uptake (49), while the other two did not elaborate on it (50,51).…”

Section: Intervention(s)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Mixed Comparisons of Aerobic Training With Different Volumes and Intensities of Physical Exercise in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Song

Chen

et al. 2022

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is essential for patients with hypertension to effectively reduce and maintain appropriate blood pressure levels. As one of the non-pharmacological and invasive methods, physical exercise seems to improve blood pressure of the patients with hypertension. However, different volumes and intensities of physical exercise on the improvement of hypertension are different. To understand the effects of the type of exercise training on blood pressure and the other health status of patients with hypertension, a network meta-analysis was used to compare the mixed effects of different types of exercise training. This systematic review includes all eligible randomized controlled trials of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 846 participants at the end of the study). The results show that a medium-intensity training (MIT) is best in improving the blood pressure of patients with hypertension, while a high-volume high-intensity interval training (HVHIIT) is better in reducing body mass and resting heart rate. In addition, the analysis of the exercise capacity shows that HVHIIT has a better effect on the improvement of patients with hypertension. Noticeably, long-term high-volume and appropriate intensity exercise can effectively improve the health status of patients with hypertension. In short, for patients with high blood pressure, MIT seems to be better at lowering blood pressure, while HVHIIT can better improve exercise ability and physical fitness. However, larger randomized controlled trials with a longer duration than those included in this meta-analysis are needed to confirm these results.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Agementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intervention(s)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Mixed Comparisons of Aerobic Training With Different Volumes and Intensities of Physical Exercise in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Song

Chen

et al. 2022

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Influence of HIIRT With Fixed and Self-Selected Recovery Intervals on Physiological, Affective, and Enjoyment Responses

Fidalgo

Joi

Lattari

et al. 2022

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effects of Self-Selected Passive Recovery Time in Interval Exercise on Perceptual and Heart Rate Responses in Older Women: A Promissory Approach

Santos

Costa

et al. 2022

Journal of Aging and Physical Activity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of passive recovery with self-selected time on affect, ratings of perceived exertion, and heart rate in self-selected interval exercises (SSIE). Fifteen older women (68.1 ± 3.8 years), weekly practitioners of functional activities participated in three SSIE with self-selected recovery time (SSRT) and one self-selected continuous exercise session, all at 24 min approximately. The SSIE had the following configurations: 1′/SSRT, 1.5′/SSRT, and 2′/SSRT. The results showed that at the beginning of stimulus heart rate in 1.5′/SSRT (107.9 ± 16.5) and 2′/SSRT (114.6 ± 17.1) were significantly greater (p < .05) compared with self-selected continuous exercise (102.8 ± 14.5). The ratings of perceived exertion in self-selected continuous exercise (2.4 ± 0.4; p < .05) were higher compared with SSIE in recovery. No significant differences were found in affect. The SSIE provided similar responses based on recoveries manipulations.

show abstract

Affective responses to different prescriptions of high-intensity interval exercise in hypertensive patients

Cited by 4 publications

References 28 publications

A Mixed Comparisons of Aerobic Training With Different Volumes and Intensities of Physical Exercise in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

A Mixed Comparisons of Aerobic Training With Different Volumes and Intensities of Physical Exercise in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Influence of HIIRT With Fixed and Self-Selected Recovery Intervals on Physiological, Affective, and Enjoyment Responses

Effects of Self-Selected Passive Recovery Time in Interval Exercise on Perceptual and Heart Rate Responses in Older Women: A Promissory Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About