2019
DOI: 10.1215/9781478090304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Pan-Africanist Pushback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these activist groups were divided mainly along the lines of human rights activism and political activism, they both shared a disdain for those kinds of activists who treated the people they worked with as suffering victims. Such an approach of humanitarian activism, they rather identified with colonial attitudes (see, generally, Branch 2007;Clarke 2009Clarke , 2019.…”
Section: Transitional Justice Activism In Northern Ugandamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these activist groups were divided mainly along the lines of human rights activism and political activism, they both shared a disdain for those kinds of activists who treated the people they worked with as suffering victims. Such an approach of humanitarian activism, they rather identified with colonial attitudes (see, generally, Branch 2007;Clarke 2009Clarke , 2019.…”
Section: Transitional Justice Activism In Northern Ugandamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This anecdote is a cogent reminder that statecraft is itself a fabrication that marshals nostalgic nationalisms to bolster commonplace understandings, following Alexander, of which bodies can truly be citizens. As Kamari Clarke (2019, 174) details in her ethnography of the International Criminal Court (ICC), juridical definitions of citizen and noncitizen (or in the case of the ICC, victims and perpetrators) are themselves sutured to “liberal legalist frameworks [that] emerge through particular ways of organizing subjects and then erasing the processes by which such formations take shape.” The state fix is always a practice of forgetting by which subjectively fashioned legal and juridical arrangements are represented as objective arbiters of who or what constitutes a real marriage, real citizen, or real justice 16…”
Section: Against the State Fix: An Incoherent Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also brings out affectively laden relations to one another and to the state, to the municipal government, and to NGOs, producing new modes of citizenship and belonging, and new horizons for collective action (Aretxaga 2003; Feldman 2018; Muir and Gupta 2018, S10). It is the multiple affective dimensions (Clarke 2019; Shoshan 2016) of work‐life experiences and governance—the pathways, struggles, complaints, hopefulness, and hopelessness—where we see generation in action.…”
Section: Technology Corruption and Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%