1997
DOI: 10.1080/10503309712331332103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective Dyadic Behavior, Core Conflictual Relationship Themes, and Success of Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of a bi-directional view of positive regard is the finding that when therapists and clients demonstrate affiliative behaviors in their interactions with one another outcome is improved (Muran, Samstag, Jilton, Batchelder, & Winston, 1997). This finding has been extended further through research looking at the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT: Luborsky & Crits-Christoph, 1998) where a number of studies have indicated that affective reciprocity is related to outcome, although interestingly, this relation is stronger for negative rather than positive emotions (Anstadt, Merten, Ullrich, & Krause, 1997). A conclusion from this finding is that mutual experiencing of conditions is a more reliable predictor of outcome than the precise valence of the affective environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In support of a bi-directional view of positive regard is the finding that when therapists and clients demonstrate affiliative behaviors in their interactions with one another outcome is improved (Muran, Samstag, Jilton, Batchelder, & Winston, 1997). This finding has been extended further through research looking at the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT: Luborsky & Crits-Christoph, 1998) where a number of studies have indicated that affective reciprocity is related to outcome, although interestingly, this relation is stronger for negative rather than positive emotions (Anstadt, Merten, Ullrich, & Krause, 1997). A conclusion from this finding is that mutual experiencing of conditions is a more reliable predictor of outcome than the precise valence of the affective environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…One successful strategy an interviewer may use to handle negative emotions is to show affects complementary to the patient's (Anstadt et al, 1997;Merten et al, 1996). This may re-establish variability in the emotional interplay.…”
Section: Main Findings and Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapists who managed to maintain variation in their facial affective repertoire were found to have a better psychotherapy outcome (Merten & Krause, 2003). Their primary facial affective expressions were complementary to the patient's (Anstadt, Merten, Ullrich & Krause, 1997;Merten, Anstadt, Ullrich, Krause & Buchheim, 1996).…”
Section: The Impact Of Patient S' Facial Affective Behaviour On Healtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflecting on this question, I started to reflect on the importance to treatment of phenomena such as prosody, facial affect, body language, humor, and the therapist's overall genuineness. These qualities, so hard to capture even in transcribed materials (and so inadequately denoted in phrases such as "common factors"), are central to the therapist's art (Anstadt, Merten, Ullrich & Krause, 1997;Weinberger, 1995).…”
Section: The Personality Of the Therapistmentioning
confidence: 99%