2012
DOI: 10.1080/14779757.2012.668496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutuality in person-centered therapy: A new agenda for research and practice

Abstract: Rogers (1957) hypothesized that, if two people are in psychological contact, and when the client is incongruent and minimally perceives the therapist's empathy, unconditional positive regard and congruence, this would be necessary and sufficient for constructive personality change. In this paper we propose that this research hypothesis, while a helpful one for testing theory, has inadvertently resulted in only a partial exploration of the process of person-centered psychotherapy insofar as it conceptualizes th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the extent the client perceives the therapist's empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence is important for good therapeutic outcome. However, contemporary theory supports a bi-directional structuring to the Rogerian conditions (Murphy, Cramer & Joseph, 2012). The bidirectional view also implies mutuality of Rogers's conditions; that is, client and therapist experience of each other will be associated with outcome and treatment progress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the extent the client perceives the therapist's empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence is important for good therapeutic outcome. However, contemporary theory supports a bi-directional structuring to the Rogerian conditions (Murphy, Cramer & Joseph, 2012). The bidirectional view also implies mutuality of Rogers's conditions; that is, client and therapist experience of each other will be associated with outcome and treatment progress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The real relationship refers to the genuine and authentic client and therapist feelings towards one another that is thought to be separate from the transference relationship. Along with this, Murphy et al (2012) have theorized the process of therapy involves the mutual experiencing of the Rogerian conditions empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence. Support for a bi-directional view also comes from research into relational depth events (Tudor, 2010;Wiggins, Elliott & Cooper, 2012) that has considered client and therapist experiences of deep reciprocal connection, and relational connectedness (Cooper, 2012), involving the synchronous client and therapist perception of connectedness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutuality is related to client progress (Murphy, Cramer & Joseph, 2012). A recent study that focused on the presence of the mutual experience of the therapeutic conditions considered the association between mutuality and client progress (Murphy, 2010;Murphy & Cramer, 2014).…”
Section: Mutuality and Client Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the therapist relates to the client in a Thou-I stance (Schmid, 2006). Mutuality implies that in these moments the relationship is experienced the same on both sides; that is, both client and therapist experience has equal validity 1960, cited in Anderson & Cissna, 1997, and that each perceives and experiences Rogers's therapeutic conditions (Murphy, Cramer & Joseph, 2012) both in and towards the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation