2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective appraisal of 3D land use visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visualization of existing and future natural environments is becoming more important for decisionmaking, as well as for recreational and scientific communication, as it considerably helps to better understand the various spatial relations in an environment [1,2]. This is an important topic for ecologists who are focusing on developing ecological models that can predict how an environment develops in the future.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visualization of existing and future natural environments is becoming more important for decisionmaking, as well as for recreational and scientific communication, as it considerably helps to better understand the various spatial relations in an environment [1,2]. This is an important topic for ecologists who are focusing on developing ecological models that can predict how an environment develops in the future.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One school of thought is that 3D models can assist users to orientate themselves in a familiar environment and can make understanding landforms easier than with traditional 2D representations Smallman et al, 2007;Wood et al, 2005;van Lammeren et al, 2010). Another school of thought posits that 3D representations will lead to cognitive overload, and that this might outweigh the benefits (Bleisch and Nebiker, 2008;Richards and Taylor, 2015;Métral et al, 2012).…”
Section: Cognition and 3d Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies focus primarily on the visualisation effectiveness of digital decision-making tools in participatory planning processes (Bailey & Grossardt, 2010;Gill, Lange, Morgan, & Romano, 2013;Schroth, Hayek, Lange, Sheppard, & Schmid, 2011), their usability in terms of user experience (De Boer, Breure, Spruit, & Voorbij, 2011;Ruotolo et al, 2013) or the affective appraisal of 3D visualisations and human-computer interaction (van Lammeren, Houtkamp, Colijn, Hilferink, & Bouwman, 2010). Dee (2004) suggests further research into critical visual studies that looks at effectiveness and usability in terms of the convergence between image intent and image reception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%