Affections de longue durée et différences de morbidité entre travailleurs salariés et travailleurs indépendants

Sauze, Laurent; Ha-Vinh, Philippe; Régnard, Pierre

doi:10.3917/pos.421.0001

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A recent study comparing the number of long-term illnesses reported to the social plans for the self-employed and for the general population concluded that those enrolled in the RSI demonstrated earlier physical wear and tear and accelerated aging (SAUZE et al, 2011). This data supports the hypothesis that guided our study of farriers, which sought to evaluate the extent of the "healthy worker effect" in this population.…”

supporting

confidence: 63%

“You Hurt Yourself a Little Every Day.”

Crasset¹

2015

travailemploi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article addresses the health of self-employed people, which statistical data indicates to be superior to that of wage-earners, all things being equal. This relative advantage is interpreted here as the result of a selection process related to the healthy worker effect. This hypothesis is successfully tested on the particular case of farriers, using semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and data from a questionnaire survey of 356 farriers-in-training. Using a qualitative approach to give depth to the results of large surveys, the author identifies some social processes that amplify or attenuate the healthy worker effect. At each stage of the farriers' career, selection by health takes different forms relating to professional ethos, the distribution of strain, lifestyle, and the ability to change careers. The healthy worker effect is nevertheless forestalled by the existence of an informal working group.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 63%

“You Hurt Yourself a Little Every Day.”

Crasset¹

2015

travailemploi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Self-employed status was previously found to be associated with nonparticipation in breast cancer screening 19 . These women's professional constraints may limit their availability for screening 30 . As reported previously, residence in the most deprived areas was associated with non-participation or only partial participation in the three cancer screening programmes 12,14 .…”

Section: Comparison With Previous Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive factors for non-participation or partial participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes†

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundNo study has investigated factors associated with non-participation or partial participation in the different combination patterns of screening programmes for all three cancers, that is, breast, colorectal and cervical cancer.MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, we sought to describe combinations of cancer screening participation rates among women in the Val-de-Marne area of France and to identify individual and contextual factors associated with non-participation or partial participation.ResultsWomen aged between 50 and 65 and who were eligible for all three screening programmes (n = 102 219) were analysed in multilevel logistic models, with the individual as the Level 1 variable and the place of residence as the Level 2 variable. The women who did not participate in any of the screening programmes were 34.4%, whereas 30.1%, 24% and 11.5% participated in one, two or all three screening programmes, respectively. Age below 55, a previous false-positive mammography, prior opportunistic mammography only, no previous mammography, membership of certain health insurance schemes (all P < 0.05) and residence in a deprived area (P < 0.001) were independently associated with non-participation or partial participation. We observed a stronger effect of deprivation on non-participation in all three cancers than in combinations of screening programmes.ConclusionOur findings suggest that the health authorities should focus on improving cancer screenings in general rather than screenings for specific types of cancer, especially among younger women and those living in the most socially deprived areas.

show abstract

Transitions in the labor market after cancer: a comparison of self-employed workers and salaried staff

Tison

Sagaon-Teyssier

Sansonetti³

et al. 2016

Support Care Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

French workers surviving cancer face the same difficulties that were observed in the National Cancer Survey of 2004: unemployment and inactivity caused by the diagnosis of cancer. Among cancer survivors, self-employed workers do not seem to be particularly more affected by inactivity than salaried staff. However, unemployment insurance is not compulsory for them, contrary to salaried staff. In this regard, self-employed workers might be a more vulnerable group.

show abstract

Affections de longue durée et différences de morbidité entre travailleurs salariés et travailleurs indépendants

Cited by 6 publications

References 12 publications

“You Hurt Yourself a Little Every Day.”

“You Hurt Yourself a Little Every Day.”

Predictive factors for non-participation or partial participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes†

Transitions in the labor market after cancer: a comparison of self-employed workers and salaried staff

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About