2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affected Anatomical Rich Club and Structural–Functional Coupling in Young Offspring of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
91
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
8
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome the drawback concerning the asymmetrical network density between the anatomical and functional connectomes (Rubinov & Sporns, 2010; see Discussion for more details), the correlations between them were corrected with a mathematical strategy that constrained functional connectivity network with edges from nonzero structural connectivity network . SC-FC coupling has been proven to be one of the most valuable topological properties for characterizing one's overall organization (Collin et al, 2017;Rudie et al, 2013;Zhang, Liao, et al, 2011). Similarly, the functional connectivity was also selected to form the corresponding vectors.…”
Section: Node-based Graph Theoretical Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To overcome the drawback concerning the asymmetrical network density between the anatomical and functional connectomes (Rubinov & Sporns, 2010; see Discussion for more details), the correlations between them were corrected with a mathematical strategy that constrained functional connectivity network with edges from nonzero structural connectivity network . SC-FC coupling has been proven to be one of the most valuable topological properties for characterizing one's overall organization (Collin et al, 2017;Rudie et al, 2013;Zhang, Liao, et al, 2011). Similarly, the functional connectivity was also selected to form the corresponding vectors.…”
Section: Node-based Graph Theoretical Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, we postulate that the individuals with promising topological modularity would be prone to make a better choice in intertemporal decisionmaking resulting from the economic-efficient pattern of brain structural and functional connectomes. Brain organization with rich-club regime produces the weights for high-degree regions to be more intimately connected among themselves than regions with the comparatively lower degree, which is widely considered to integrate the parallel information among the diverse portions of whole-brain connectivity network (Bullmore & Sporns, 2012;Collin, Scholtens, Kahn, Hillegers, & van den Heuvel, 2017;Grayson et al, 2014;Van Den Heuvel & Sporns, 2011). Highly hierarchical organization of brain connectomes reflect a biologically plausible regime in favor of the processing and assignment of information, whereas the strong assortativity between hub regions can predominately elevate robustness of brain networks (Barthélemy, Barrat, Pastor-Satorras, & Vespignani, 2004;Bullmore & Sporns, 2009, 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No additional article was found in the manual search. Most of the studies were conducted in adolescents [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] with only two studies conducted in young adults [31,32]. The samples of subjects at-risk for BD were comprised of healthy offspring of bipolar patients [25,28,29], healthy and symptomatic offspring of bipolar patients [24,26,27,30], symptomatic offspring of bipolar patients [23] and healthy and symptomatic offspring or siblings of bipolar patients [31,32].…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples of subjects at-risk for BD were comprised of healthy offspring of bipolar patients [25,28,29], healthy and symptomatic offspring of bipolar patients [24,26,27,30], symptomatic offspring of bipolar patients [23] and healthy and symptomatic offspring or siblings of bipolar patients [31,32]. Some studies were conducted by the same research groups, with partially overlapping samples [23,26,27,30] The studies focused in 4 functional imaging domains: 2 studies employed an emotion processing task [23,26]; 2 studies employed a cognitive-affective task [25,31]; 3 studies employed a reward processing task [27,28,30] and 3 were resting state fMRI studies [24,29,32]. Table 1 resume the main methodological characteristics and results of the selected studies.…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%