2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422)
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2003.1241949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affect-sensitive human-robot cooperation - theory and experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any unwanted variation in the stress levels or other physiological signal of the human agent can then be used as a trigger for reallocations (Bailey, Scerbo, Freeman, Mikulka, & Scott, 2006;Freeman, Mikulka, Scerbo, & Hadley, 1998;Freeman, Mikulka, Prinzel, & Scerbo, 1999;Freeman, Mikulka, Scerbo, Prinzel, & Clouatre, 2000;Prinzel, Freeman, Scerbo, Mikulka, & Pope, 2003). Emotional assessment of operators by using physiological responses, such as excited physiological state (corresponding to fear) and calm physiological state (corresponding to meditation), could also aid in determining the mental state of the operator (Herbelin, Benzaki, Riquier, Renault, & Thalmann, 2004;Rani, Sarkar, & Smith, 2003). The constant monitoring of physiological signals is a function itself and is allocated to the automated agent at all times.…”
Section: Third-generation Function Allocation Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any unwanted variation in the stress levels or other physiological signal of the human agent can then be used as a trigger for reallocations (Bailey, Scerbo, Freeman, Mikulka, & Scott, 2006;Freeman, Mikulka, Scerbo, & Hadley, 1998;Freeman, Mikulka, Prinzel, & Scerbo, 1999;Freeman, Mikulka, Scerbo, Prinzel, & Clouatre, 2000;Prinzel, Freeman, Scerbo, Mikulka, & Pope, 2003). Emotional assessment of operators by using physiological responses, such as excited physiological state (corresponding to fear) and calm physiological state (corresponding to meditation), could also aid in determining the mental state of the operator (Herbelin, Benzaki, Riquier, Renault, & Thalmann, 2004;Rani, Sarkar, & Smith, 2003). The constant monitoring of physiological signals is a function itself and is allocated to the automated agent at all times.…”
Section: Third-generation Function Allocation Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, studies with robots and simulated agents showed that emotional mechanisms can improve the performance of agents and may be cheaper than other, more complex nonemotional control mechanisms (e.g., Murphy et al, 2002;Scheutz and Logan, 2001). Even though many important advances have been made in our understanding of how to make machines recognize or signal different kinds of affect in interactions with people (e.g., see Rani et al, 2003;Lisetti et al, 2004;Kanda et al, 2005), there is currently only one study that investigated the effect of the robot's affect expression on team performance in a joint human-robot team task based on an objective performance measure ("time-to-task-completion").…”
Section: The Utility Of Affect For Nhl-hrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this apparent simplicity is extremely subjective to human beings, and the computation of those indices hides a great complexity that Hanjalic and Wang overcome by selecting 'arbitrary' digital features. To avoid this, other researchers (Healey and Picard 1998;Rani et al 2003) designed protocols to learn and optimise the correlations between physiological data and affective states. Whatever the algorithm (statistical or fuzzy respectively), the principle is the same: record various physiological signals, compute several parameters, and operate the classification.…”
Section: Affective Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%