2023
DOI: 10.46298/jdmdh.11164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affect as a proxy for literary mood

Abstract: We propose to use affect as a proxy for mood in literary texts. In this study, we explore the differences in computationally detecting tone versus detecting mood. Methodologically we utilize affective word embeddings to look at the affective distribution in different text segments. We also present a simple yet efficient and effective method of enhancing emotion lexicons to take both semantic shift and the domain of the text into account producing real-world congruent results closely matching both contemporary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been argued that more real-world congruent results with reusable methods can be obtained by using lexicons either independently (Teodorescu & Mohammad, 2022) or together with data-driven methods (Öhman, 2021). Öhman and Rossi (2023) use emotion lexicons to create affective word embeddings that allow them to create domainspecific models that take semantic shifts into account when attempting to use affect as a proxy for mood in literary texts.…”
Section: Computational Approaches To Shame and Guilt Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been argued that more real-world congruent results with reusable methods can be obtained by using lexicons either independently (Teodorescu & Mohammad, 2022) or together with data-driven methods (Öhman, 2021). Öhman and Rossi (2023) use emotion lexicons to create affective word embeddings that allow them to create domainspecific models that take semantic shifts into account when attempting to use affect as a proxy for mood in literary texts.…”
Section: Computational Approaches To Shame and Guilt Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%