2019
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.06345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol Delivery Through an Adult High-Flow Nasal Cannula Circuit Using Low-Flow Oxygen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporation of nebulizers into HFNC delivery systems has gained interest in recent years [2,3,4,5,6,7,8], for its combined benefits of comfort associated with nasal interface, trans-nasal pulmonary delivery of aerosolized medication, and mechanical benefits of HFNC. Aerosol with HFNC has been described with bronchodilators for asthmatic [2], bronchiolitis [3,4], or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients [5,6,7], and inhaled epoprostenol for patients with pulmonary hypertension or hypoxemia [8]. Interruption of HFNC for administration of standard aerosol treatment for periods up to 15 min may compromise oxygenation, and administration by mouth, while receiving HFNC reduces the inhaled dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporation of nebulizers into HFNC delivery systems has gained interest in recent years [2,3,4,5,6,7,8], for its combined benefits of comfort associated with nasal interface, trans-nasal pulmonary delivery of aerosolized medication, and mechanical benefits of HFNC. Aerosol with HFNC has been described with bronchodilators for asthmatic [2], bronchiolitis [3,4], or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients [5,6,7], and inhaled epoprostenol for patients with pulmonary hypertension or hypoxemia [8]. Interruption of HFNC for administration of standard aerosol treatment for periods up to 15 min may compromise oxygenation, and administration by mouth, while receiving HFNC reduces the inhaled dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,10] However, the highest patient tolerability and preference were reported with HFNC as only 8% of participants complained of this interface. [2,8,10] HMP and HFM showed approximately similar results of the ex-vivo total delivered dose and the recovered fractions of salbutamol from urine samples and were significantly higher than that of HFNC (p<0.05). Consequently, a better pulmonary deposition could be obtained with HMP and HFM interfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In a crossover RCT with 12 stable COPD patients, Madney and colleagues compared systemic bioavailability of albuterol administered by JN or VMN in line with HFNC at 5 L/min. Urinary albuterol excretion at 30 min and 24 h was 2-fold higher with the VMN than the JN ( p < 0.05) [ 11 ].…”
Section: Clinical Evidence Of Trans-nasal Aerosol Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the residual volume of drug remaining in nebulizers is higher in JN than VMN (45% vs 3%) [ 41 , 43 ]. Consequently, VMN generated 2–3 times higher inhaled dose than JN via HFNC for both pediatric and adult populations (Table 2 ) [ 11 , 33 , 38 , 41 ]. For these reasons, VMNs are preferred over JNs for aerosol delivery with HFNC [ 8 ].…”
Section: Factors Influencing Trans-nasal Aerosol Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%