2017
DOI: 10.5194/acp-2017-913
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol Characteristics in the Entrainment Interface Layer In Relation to the Marine Boundary Layer and Free Troposphere

Abstract: <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> This study uses airborne data from two field campaigns off the California coast to characterize aerosol size distribution characteristics in the entrainment interface layer (EIL), a thin and turbulent layer above marine stratocumulus cloud tops, that separates the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer (STBL) from the free troposphere (FT). The vertical bounds of the EIL are defined in this work based on considerations of buoyancy and turbule… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of N a in the boundary layer tended to be more vertically homogeneous as compared to the FT, owing to more mixing and turbulence, as demonstrated previously for the study region based on aerosol size distribution data (Dadashazar et al, ). More specifically, for the nine soundings exhibiting evidence of BB layers both below and above cloud, the standard deviation of the N a values for the profiles below and above cloud were 165 and 839 cm −3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Concentrations of N a in the boundary layer tended to be more vertically homogeneous as compared to the FT, owing to more mixing and turbulence, as demonstrated previously for the study region based on aerosol size distribution data (Dadashazar et al, ). More specifically, for the nine soundings exhibiting evidence of BB layers both below and above cloud, the standard deviation of the N a values for the profiles below and above cloud were 165 and 839 cm −3 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The AC-OAL is operationally defined as the narrow altitude band (generally <200 m) directly above the marine stratocumulus cloud decks where OA mass loadings were relatively large (>1.5 μg m −3 ) and a distinct AC-OAL PMF factor contributed >80% of total OA mass ( Figure S6 ). This region occupies a similar location as the commonly referenced entrainment interface layer (EIL) above cloud decks ( Dadashazar et al, 2018 ; Wood, 2012 ), but is defined by the aerosol characteristics described above rather than by turbulence and buoyancy characteristics, as is common for the EIL ( Carman et al, 2012 ). Median aerosol properties are reported in Tables 1 – 3 for each of these three regions, while Figure 2 displays vertical profiles of aerosol and meteorological properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median aerosol number concentrations observed in the MBL (754 cm −3 ) exceeded those in the FT (333 cm −3 ), as expected. Observed particle concentrations were maximized within the AC-OAL (1,662 cm −3 ), where intense actinic fluxes and elevated concentrations of the hydroxyl radical may drive new particle formation ( Dadashazar et al, 2018 ; Mauldin et al, 1999 ). For all measured SS > 0.1%, observed CCN concentrations were also largest within the AC-OAL, rather than the MBL or FT, underscoring the importance of understanding the hygroscopicity of above-cloud CCN-active particles ( Coggon et al, 2014 ; Sorooshian, Lu, et al, 2007 ; Sorooshian et al, 2007 ; Wang et al, 2008 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Table shows the obvious result that N a values are much higher above cloud in BB conditions 2,400 cm 3 (95% confidence interval, 1,518–3,363 cm 3 ) versus non‐BB conditions 202 cm 3 (110–294 cm 3 ), an important result is that BB conditions also yielded much higher N a values below cloud 912 cm 3 (415–1,725 cm 3 ) versus 123 cm −3 (73–180 cm −3 ). Thus, primary activation of subcloud CCN into cloud droplets is not limited to aerosols emitted within the MBL but rather can be entrained from the FT as documented in several past works (e.g., Capaldo et al, ; Clarke et al, ; Dadashazar et al, ; Katoshevski et al, ; Wood et al, ). Past work has examined how the variation in subcloud aerosol number concentration is related to parameters such as the gradient of CCN number concentration between vertical layers above and below cloud, boundary layer depth, and the time passed since aerosol and cloud layer have come into contact (e.g., Diamond et al, ; Wood et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%