2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-89988-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Optimization of Car Shapes Using the Continuous Adjoint Method and an RBF Morpher

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By determining € x 1 from equation (1) and substituting it in equation (2), the error dynamics can be written as…”
Section: Sliding Mode Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By determining € x 1 from equation (1) and substituting it in equation (2), the error dynamics can be written as…”
Section: Sliding Mode Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, the automotive industry has witnessed rapid progress, and several studies in the cases of design of car shape based on aerodynamic optimization [1], [2], optimization of the air intake system of the engine [3], investigation of sound quality for passenger car [4], stress analysis and design improvement of door hinge for compact cars [5], study of fuel consumption for various driving styles in conventional and hybrid electric vehicles [6,7], design optimization of the cowl cross bar-light [8], investigation of a rear independent suspension for light vehicle [9], and study of nonlinear control of suspension system [10][11][12] have been conducted to develop and optimize different aspects of vehicle performance. e suspension system is one of the main components of a car which plays an important role in providing passenger comfort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mesh with ∼4.2 × 10 6 nodes, ∼3.58 × 10 5 of which are surface mesh nodes, consists of various types of elements, with up to 22-face polyhedra. The reference mesh is displaced to the deformed one, as a result of a shape optimization for minimizing drag [52] (not included in the paper). Mesh quality metrics are listed in Table 4.…”
Section: Parametric Study On the Predictor Matrix Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of stochastic and gradient‐based methods have been devised to solve aerodynamic shape optimization problems such as the design of ducts or manifolds for minimum power losses, cars with optimal combination of drag and lift, 1 aircraft/wings for maximum lift 2,3 or minimum drag, 4 and so forth. During the optimization, a technique to deal with the necessary changes of the boundaries (surface mesh), namely, to adapt the computational mesh (volume mesh) to the updated geometry, is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%