1987
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1987)113:3(349)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Devices for Tall Buildings and Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proper selection of the building shape and the introduction of suitable aerodynamic changes may reduce the wind motion or may change its pattern around a building. Therefore, extensive research has been performed on aerodynamic characteristics and the response of the buildings to wind (Amin and Ahuja, 2010;Ilgin and Günel, 2007;Kareem and Tamura, 1996;Kwok and Bailey, 1987;Melbourne and Cheung, 1988;Miyashita, 1993;Xie, 2012) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Geometry Variations In Cornersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper selection of the building shape and the introduction of suitable aerodynamic changes may reduce the wind motion or may change its pattern around a building. Therefore, extensive research has been performed on aerodynamic characteristics and the response of the buildings to wind (Amin and Ahuja, 2010;Ilgin and Günel, 2007;Kareem and Tamura, 1996;Kwok and Bailey, 1987;Melbourne and Cheung, 1988;Miyashita, 1993;Xie, 2012) (Figure 2).…”
Section: Geometry Variations In Cornersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proved that modifying the shape of tall buildings can significantly affect cross-wind loads and wind-induced responses (Dutton and Isyumov, 1990;Hayashida and Iwasa, 1990;Kawai, 1998;Kwok, 1988;Kwok and Bailey, 1987;Melbourne, 1989;Melbourne and Cheung, 1988;Miyashita et al, 1993), and hence construction cost. However, an aerodynamically efficient plan shape may come at the cost of usable floor area that, in turn, may require additional compensatory storeys, which obviously increase the wind loads and construction cost again.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on the observed base force, using time or frequency domain analysis, the response of structures can be predicted [8]. Another effective way to evaluate the aeroelastic performance of structures is an aeroelastic test technique [9], [10]. From the HFBB and aeroelastic test, the wind effect on structures could be evaluated and utilized for designing engineering structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%