2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic perspectives of aerodynamic treatments of square tall buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these atypical shapes improve the aerodynamic performances of the buildings themselves and bring economic benefits to the developers. For example, the aerodynamic forces and wind excitations of tall buildings may be effectively minimised by tapered shapes and chamfered corners [11,18,19,21]. In addition, certain building forms have proved useful in achieving acceptable wind conditions at the pedestrian level around buildings [5,10,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these atypical shapes improve the aerodynamic performances of the buildings themselves and bring economic benefits to the developers. For example, the aerodynamic forces and wind excitations of tall buildings may be effectively minimised by tapered shapes and chamfered corners [11,18,19,21]. In addition, certain building forms have proved useful in achieving acceptable wind conditions at the pedestrian level around buildings [5,10,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fu et al [10] computed field measurements of the characteristics of the boundary layer and storm reaction of two super tall buildings. Tse et al [11] deliberated the general concept to find out the wind loadings and wind-induced responses of square tall buildings with different sizes of chamfered and recessed corners. Irwin [12] focused on the subject of determining and controlling the structural response under wind action for super-tall buildings which require much more pragmatically modelled wind engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineering flows over rough surfaces are commonly used as the analytical platforms to enrich our fundamental understanding of urban atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) problems [5,6]. Typical applications include wind engineering for the built environment [7,8], particulate matter (PM) in street canyons [9], city breathability [10,11], and pedestrian wind comfort/safety [12] as well as guideline formulation [13]. Unlike their smooth-surface counterparts, the aerodynamic resistance induced by rough surfaces on turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) is less sensitive to the Reynolds number Re (= Uh/ν; where U is the characteristic velocity scale of flows, h the characteristic length scale of roughness elements and ν the kinematic viscosity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%