2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.105321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic design assessment and comparisons of the MULDICON UCAV concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen the small apex vortex develops close to the wing, and when AOA is increased, this flow pattern mostly remains unchanged (Nangia et al, 2019;Loeser et al, 2010).…”
Section: Flow Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen the small apex vortex develops close to the wing, and when AOA is increased, this flow pattern mostly remains unchanged (Nangia et al, 2019;Loeser et al, 2010).…”
Section: Flow Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This default value is far too high, as proven by the fact that Fluent diverged in the AMG solver when iterations began. While a flow courant number of less than ten is not advised (Matsson, 2021). Furthermore, the Courant number of 50 has been used in several past aerodynamics research (Fuller, 2012).…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The X-47B blended wing body aircraft is selected as the basic configuration. [16][17] This aircraft is a U.S. experimental unmanned combat aircraft. The aircraft is 11.63 m long with a wingspan of 18.92 m, and the wings can be folded when the aircraft is shipborne.…”
Section: Calculation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing such a platform for sustainable supersonic cruise at Mach 1.60 is the goal of the current research project. The academic research projects are mostly focused on subsonic systems with general configurations, [2][3][4] and the list of operational unmanned flight systems consists of different types of cruise missiles, target drones, 5 and subsonic reconnaissance and attack systems, 6 but not many supersonic air-breathing flight vehicles with the ability for runway takeoff and landing; the JAXA S3TD Silent Supersonic Technology Demonstrator, for flight at Mach 1.6-1.7, first presented by Murakami 7,8 in 2006, is an example for which its aerodynamic configuration is unlike high maneuverable systems. In 2012, a concept of a light supersonic drone by Sibylle Walter 9 presented an economic single normal shock system to create a test bed for academic research such as thrust vectoring and control algorithms at Mach 1.40.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%