1988
DOI: 10.2514/3.25997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic design and performance of a bent-axis geometry vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5] it has demonstrated that these hinge moments can be controlled to within acceptable design specifications with proper selections of vehicle center of gravity location or vehicle tail section length. However, the result is obtained under the assumption of constant freestream conditions and ideal gas behavior, neglecting the effects of boundary layer transition and base pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [5] it has demonstrated that these hinge moments can be controlled to within acceptable design specifications with proper selections of vehicle center of gravity location or vehicle tail section length. However, the result is obtained under the assumption of constant freestream conditions and ideal gas behavior, neglecting the effects of boundary layer transition and base pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to design the variable-bend-tail geometry vehicle for level flight missions, which is governed by the ability of the hinge actuators, to overcome the aerodynamic hinge moments experienced by the movable aft section or tail section, many works [5][6][7][8] has researched on the aerodynamics design and performance analysis of the bentaxis geometry vehicle and variable-bend-tail vehicle. In [5] it has demonstrated that these hinge moments can be controlled to within acceptable design specifications with proper selections of vehicle center of gravity location or vehicle tail section length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows that the inertial load from the mass of the nose cone tends to balance the lift load and the sum of all torques around the hinge points is zero when the design condition is found. However, because of low mass of canard fin, inertial force F Ifin much less than lift force F Lfin and balancing of hinge moments is not feasible [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%