2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2013.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aeolian sand transport over gobi with different gravel coverages under limited sand supply: A mobile wind tunnel investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3), which differed significantly from results of wind tunnel experiments that the flux density profile over gobi presented a non-monotone curve (e.g., Dong et al (2004) and Qu et al (2005)). At the same study site, our recent portable wind tunnel results revealed that in most cases sand flux density decreased exponentially with height only above 50-80 mm, while they increased with increasing height below this critical height (Tan et al, 2013), and thus the profile also showed a non-monotone curve shape as the above mentioned wind tunnel results.…”
Section: Sediment Flux Density Profilementioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…3), which differed significantly from results of wind tunnel experiments that the flux density profile over gobi presented a non-monotone curve (e.g., Dong et al (2004) and Qu et al (2005)). At the same study site, our recent portable wind tunnel results revealed that in most cases sand flux density decreased exponentially with height only above 50-80 mm, while they increased with increasing height below this critical height (Tan et al, 2013), and thus the profile also showed a non-monotone curve shape as the above mentioned wind tunnel results.…”
Section: Sediment Flux Density Profilementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Recently, our portable wind tunnel experiments on aeolian transport over gobi with different gravel coverages showed that above the threshold velocity, sediment flux over gobi also behaved like an Owen-type saltation equation in accordance with Eq. (1) (Tan et al, 2013). Thus, this study indicates that the observation method of aeolian transport using horizontal and vertical sediment traps coupled to weighing sensors can effectively build the relationship between sediment transport rate and wind friction velocity, and results of these field studies can also be applied to the corresponding revalidation of wind tunnel experiment results.…”
Section: Prediction Of Sediment Transport Ratementioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In an attempt to explain the poor performance of aeolian sediment transport models in coastal environments, many authors emphasized the importance of bed surface properties. Typical bed surface properties that are found along the coast and assumed to explain at least partially the poor performance of aeolian sediment transport models are high moisture contents [e.g., Wiggs et al , ; Davidson‐Arnott et al , ; Darke and McKenna Neuman , ; McKenna Neuman and Sanderson , ; Udo et al , ; Bauer et al , ; Edwards and Namikas , ; Namikas et al , ; Scheidt et al , ], salt crusts [e.g., Nickling and Ecclestone , ], bed slopes [e.g., Iversen and Rasmussen , ], vegetation [e.g., Arens , ; Lancaster and Baas , ; Okin , ; Li et al , ; Dupont et al , ], shell pavements [e.g., van der Wal , ; McKenna Neuman et al , ], and sorted and armored beach surfaces [e.g., Gillette and Stockton , ; Gillies et al , ; Tan et al , ; Cheng et al , ]. The influence of these bed surface properties on aeolian sediment transport has been investigated and often resulted in modified values for the velocity threshold [e.g., Howard , ; Dyer , ; Belly , ; Johnson , ; Hotta et al , ; Nickling and Ecclestone , ; Arens , ; King et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%