2006
DOI: 10.1177/089686080602600107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adynamic Bone Revisited: Is there Progress?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical main risk factors for ABD development are age, uremia, calcium overload, excessive PTH suppression resulting from vitamin D receptor activators, PD itself, and diabetes mellitus. 16,17 The patients in the present study were relatively young (50.3 ± 10.2 years old) and had been receiving an adequate dialysis dosage according to the weekly KT/V. 14 Nevertheless, the prevalence of ABD was very high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The classical main risk factors for ABD development are age, uremia, calcium overload, excessive PTH suppression resulting from vitamin D receptor activators, PD itself, and diabetes mellitus. 16,17 The patients in the present study were relatively young (50.3 ± 10.2 years old) and had been receiving an adequate dialysis dosage according to the weekly KT/V. 14 Nevertheless, the prevalence of ABD was very high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Adynamic Bone Disease (ABD) as one extreme of the different forms of renal osteodystrophy has become an increasingly common manifestation of bone abnormalities in CKD patients. ABD may be associated with serious clinical consequences such as fractures [ 2 , 3 ] and vascular calcification [ 4 , 5 ], which in turn may contribute to the high mortality rates of patients with CKD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the changes in bone formation and/or resorption might have already subsided at the studied time point. Indeed, the observed bone phenotype (a reduced bone volume with inappropriately unaltered bone formation and resorption) well agreed with adynamic bone, which rendered bone difficult to repair microcracks and could also increase fracture risk (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%