Abstract:The T.R.A.I.N.E.R. model described in this article engages counselors in social advocacy and professional advocacy concurrently, facilitates counselor connection and collaboration with diverse communities, and raises the awareness of the counseling profession in the general marketplace. The model assumes social and professional advocacy are complementary and outlines a process where use of each strengthens the other. An example of the model‟s application is offered with discussion regarding implications forits… Show more
“…The resources and activities less commonly reported (e.g., having access to government liaisons, legislative policy writing) suggest students have yet to develop skills to intervene at organizational and societal levels. Training such as the TRAINER model (Hof et al, 2009) that directly targets students' development of action-oriented implementation plans could help further develop advocacy skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hof, Dinsmore, Barber, Suhr, and Scofield (2009) proposed the TRAINER model, an acronym for a 7-step collaborative process, to help counselors integrate social and professional advocacy into practice. The TRAINER model steps are (a) target advocacy needs, (b) respond by implementing an advocacy competency that can address the needs, (c) articulate a plan to accomplish advocacy, (d) implement the plan, (e) network for advocacy during training, (f) evaluate the training, and (g) retarget to meet other advocacy needs (Hof et al, 2009). This model provides instruction on how to implement social and professional advocacy efforts by collaboratively identifying steps toward action, and gaining feedback on the success of the implementation (Hof et al, 2009).…”
Advocacy is considered a core competency within the field of counseling psychology, however more attention is needed to the training and assessment of advocacy competence for counselors-in-training. This study utilized Ratts and Ford's (2010) Advocacy Competencies Self-Assessment survey to measure self-perceived advocacy competence of master's and doctoral students within counseling (Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs-accredited) and counseling psychology (American Psychological Association-accredited) programs. An exploratory factor analysis suggested 3 underlying factors in self-reported advocacy competence: Alliance Building and Systems Collaboration, Action and Assessment, and Awareness Building. Master's and doctoral students displayed marginal differences in Advocacy Competencies Self-Assessment scores with doctoral students scoring slightly higher in the Awareness Building factor. Respondents' perceived level of advocacy importance was a significant predictor of advocacy competence. Program characteristics (advocacy-related resources and opportunities to engage in advocacy activities) were also significant predictors of perceived competence. We propose a developmental model of advocacy competency acquisition as a basis for future research on assessment and training of advocacy skills.
“…The resources and activities less commonly reported (e.g., having access to government liaisons, legislative policy writing) suggest students have yet to develop skills to intervene at organizational and societal levels. Training such as the TRAINER model (Hof et al, 2009) that directly targets students' development of action-oriented implementation plans could help further develop advocacy skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hof, Dinsmore, Barber, Suhr, and Scofield (2009) proposed the TRAINER model, an acronym for a 7-step collaborative process, to help counselors integrate social and professional advocacy into practice. The TRAINER model steps are (a) target advocacy needs, (b) respond by implementing an advocacy competency that can address the needs, (c) articulate a plan to accomplish advocacy, (d) implement the plan, (e) network for advocacy during training, (f) evaluate the training, and (g) retarget to meet other advocacy needs (Hof et al, 2009). This model provides instruction on how to implement social and professional advocacy efforts by collaboratively identifying steps toward action, and gaining feedback on the success of the implementation (Hof et al, 2009).…”
Advocacy is considered a core competency within the field of counseling psychology, however more attention is needed to the training and assessment of advocacy competence for counselors-in-training. This study utilized Ratts and Ford's (2010) Advocacy Competencies Self-Assessment survey to measure self-perceived advocacy competence of master's and doctoral students within counseling (Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs-accredited) and counseling psychology (American Psychological Association-accredited) programs. An exploratory factor analysis suggested 3 underlying factors in self-reported advocacy competence: Alliance Building and Systems Collaboration, Action and Assessment, and Awareness Building. Master's and doctoral students displayed marginal differences in Advocacy Competencies Self-Assessment scores with doctoral students scoring slightly higher in the Awareness Building factor. Respondents' perceived level of advocacy importance was a significant predictor of advocacy competence. Program characteristics (advocacy-related resources and opportunities to engage in advocacy activities) were also significant predictors of perceived competence. We propose a developmental model of advocacy competency acquisition as a basis for future research on assessment and training of advocacy skills.
“…Professional orientation courses, especially when offered at the outset of the training curriculum, are well suited for advocacy pedagogy. Exposing master’s students to the importance of advocacy early on communicates the expectation that advocacy is a central part of counselor identity, and it allows students and educators to engage in more nuanced dialogue later in their training program about specific issues (Hof et al, 2009; Miller & Sendrowitz, 2011). When specific advocacy initiatives later emerge, such as an upcoming meeting with a lawmaker to discuss Medicare policy, students can be involved in the process by writing letters that are delivered at the meeting, promoting the issue in a social media campaign that is directed toward the legislator’s social media account, or, in certain cases, attending the meeting as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing a strategy to enhance advocacy on a specific issue requires knowledge of a policy’s unique legislative history and key constituencies, as well as how policy change impacts diverse stakeholders (Fullen, 2016; Oberlander, 2003). Although the development of counselors’ general advocacy skills and dispositions is useful, advocacy scholars suggest that specific advocacy strategies are necessary to meet the needs of specific at‐risk groups (Hof, Dinsmore, Barber, Suhr, & Scofield, 2009).…”
The authors analyzed data from 5,528 American Counseling Association members to examine advocacy beliefs and behavior regarding Medicare reimbursement and advocacy for counselors. Nearly half (49.3%) of the respondents had participated in one or more forms of Medicare reimbursement advocacy. Advocacy participation differed significantly by professional status.
“…Student social advocacy is systematic but with assistance because, at this stage, students apply knowledge and their skills in the one-time caring plan (Preece & Shneiderman, 2009). Thus, social and professional advocacy are complementaries, and these outlines the process and reinforce one another (Hof, D., Dinsmore, J., Barber & Suhr 2009).…”
This study aimed to examine the implementation of quarantine in terms of the online learning model in improving civic responsibility as a solution during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. This study's subject was 47 students (17 males and 30 females) at the Department of Teacher and Primary Education Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, which was processing Citizenship Education in the academic year 2019/2020. The researchers collected the data from students and lecturers through observation, interviews, and documentation study. The technique of data analysis was performed through descriptive qualitative analysis. The study results indicated that the online learning model at the Department of Teacher and Primary Education Ahmad Dahlan University in 2019/2020 could improve students' civic responsibility. The data have shown that civic responsibility consisted of 97 % social participation, 76 % social advocacy, and 79 % citizenship participation. This study could finally conclude that online learning model could improve civic responsibility as a solution during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia and tended to be an alternative and effective model in rare situations. This research can be used as input in increasing civic responsibility as a solution during a pandemic in Indonesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.