2017
DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2017.1282567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advocacy processes in mental health: a qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A qualitative meta-synthesis by Stomski et al (2017) found that healthcare providers rarely recognise that patients should have full control over decisions, and that patient participation is frequently characterised by tokenism. Myers (2016) recently identified a systemic lack of respect for the autonomy of hospitalised patients and a lack of true engagement in their care and treatment as a barrier to recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A qualitative meta-synthesis by Stomski et al (2017) found that healthcare providers rarely recognise that patients should have full control over decisions, and that patient participation is frequently characterised by tokenism. Myers (2016) recently identified a systemic lack of respect for the autonomy of hospitalised patients and a lack of true engagement in their care and treatment as a barrier to recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is only a limited empirical understanding of the mechanisms and processes by which inpatient treatment aids recovery of hospitalised mental health patients in distress (Smith & Spitzmueller, 2016;Thomas, Shattell, & Martin, 2002). Existing studies of established principles of inpatient care, such as genuine respect, collaboration, and promoting patient autonomy, tend to be implemented to only a limited extent (Oeye, Bjelland, Skorpen, & Anderssen, 2009;Oute, 2018;Stomski, Morrison, Whitely, & Brennan, 2017;Waldemar, Arnfred, Petersen, & Korsbek, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, cultural change requires time, and more immediate solutions are therefore required to foster service user participation in decision-making. As such, the importance of individual advocacy needs to be highlighted, as research has shown that health professionals are more accommodating of service user preferences when advocates attend consultations [ 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Stomski et al . ). Consumers and their carers have expressed dissatisfaction with a lack of therapeutic engagement in mental health services (McAllister et al .…”
Section: What Is the Problem And Why Are Mental Health Care Plans Neementioning
confidence: 97%
“…It should also describe the strategies and resources to achieve these outcomes and should give clear criteria for assessing the satisfaction and outcomes of care for the consumer (Bee et al 2015a;McHugh & Byrne 2012). However, the research indicates that mental health service staff often fail to develop meaningful well thought out care plans with consumers (Bee et al 2015a;Bee et al 2015b;Doody et al 2017;Stomski et al 2017). Consumers and their carers have expressed dissatisfaction with a lack of therapeutic engagement in mental health services (McAllister et al 2019;Rydon 2005;Tee et al 2007;Theodoridou et al 2012;Walsh & Boyle 2009), and that they want strengthbased approaches based on concepts of recovery (Dobie, Bulla & Swanke 2010;Henderson et al 2010;Rose 2003).…”
Section: What Is the Problem And Why Are Mental Health Care Plans Neementioning
confidence: 99%