1994
DOI: 10.12930/0271-9517-14.2.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advising Alliances: Sharing Responsibility for Student Success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We acknowledge that we cannot adequately assess the measurement properties of the shared responsibility domain because it is measured by only a single item. However, we would argue for retaining the shared responsibility function in the model because, according to Frost (1991), shared responsibility is the dominant theme in developmental advising. The χ 2 statistic for the fit of the five-factor model of advising function importance was 448.41 ( df = 45, p < .001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We acknowledge that we cannot adequately assess the measurement properties of the shared responsibility domain because it is measured by only a single item. However, we would argue for retaining the shared responsibility function in the model because, according to Frost (1991), shared responsibility is the dominant theme in developmental advising. The χ 2 statistic for the fit of the five-factor model of advising function importance was 448.41 ( df = 45, p < .001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tailoring advising encounters to student circumstances, characteristics, and education level has long been considered good practice in academic advising (e.g., Frost, 1991; Gordon & Habley, 2000; Gordon, Habley, & Grites, 2008; Huff & Jordan, 2007; Strommer, 1995). Yet, to our knowledge, no research has examined how the specific advising priorities of community college pre- and posttransfer students differ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because both of these elements were expansive (and expensive) projects, the college applied for and was awarded a Title III grant in 1992 to accomplish both goals. Following Frost' s (1994) guidance, an early grant project activity was to involve the faculty leadership team in drafting a mission statement for the developmental advising program: "To create for all students, through furnishing resources for educational planning, a system of shared responsibility between students and the college, resulting in social and academic integration, educational and career plans, and the acquisition of study and life skills. "…”
Section: Getting Readymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the main focus of the developmental model of advising is to encourage and enhance intentional developmental changes in students and to systematically involve students in the decision-making process (Herndon, Kaiser, & Creamer, 1996). A developmental advisor engages students in conversations and information exchanges that assist the students in clarifying their career goals and educational plans, balancing the amount of challenge and structure they offer based on the students' developmental needs (Frost, 1994;King, 1996). Just as with prescriptive advising, developmental advisors need to provide accurate, up-to-date information to advisees; however, developmental advisors go further by helping advisees formulate and find answers to their own questions (Polson, 1994).…”
Section: Prescriptive Versus Developmental Advisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the main focus of the developmental advising model is encouraging and enhancing intentional developmental changes in students and systematically involving students in the decision-making process (Herndon, Kaiser, & Creamer, 1996). A developmental advisor engages students in conversations and information exchanges that assist the students in clarifying their career goals and educational plans, balancing the amount of challenge and structure they offer based on the students' developmental needs (Frost, 1994;King, 1996).…”
Section: Recommendations For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%