2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0021849904040255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advertising as Public Diplomacy: Attitude Change among International Audiences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The campaign portrayed the lives of Muslims in the United States and was designed to improve the U.S. image in Arab and Muslim countries. Kendrick and Fullerton (2004) evaluated this effort through a combination of classic wartime propaganda experiments and an advertising copy test used to evaluate regular television commercials. The views of international students studying in London toward the United States were tested before and after showing them the advertised spots.…”
Section: Public Relations: Promoting Image and Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The campaign portrayed the lives of Muslims in the United States and was designed to improve the U.S. image in Arab and Muslim countries. Kendrick and Fullerton (2004) evaluated this effort through a combination of classic wartime propaganda experiments and an advertising copy test used to evaluate regular television commercials. The views of international students studying in London toward the United States were tested before and after showing them the advertised spots.…”
Section: Public Relations: Promoting Image and Reputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, after 2008, the West fully realised it was fighting an ideological battle against AQ. The problem was partly exacerbated because the United States reduced its public diplomacy capability after the Reagan Administration (Brown, 2002; Taylor, 2003), and a previous effort to improve public perceptions of the United States in Muslim countries (‘The Shared Values Initiative’) was perceived to, but may not have actually, backfired (see Fullerton and Kendrick, 2006; Kendrick and Fullerton, 2004).…”
Section: Positioning (And Countering) the Aq Brandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 7 -exciting). The selection of these attributes was based on a review of consumer studies on the effectiveness of TV advertisements (Kendrick and Fullerton, 2004). The average ratings from 429 survey respondents who watched the TV advertisement are reported in Figure 1.…”
Section: How Do the Respondents Like The Tv Advertisement?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the study population was comprised of students at a public university in the USA, and the findings may not be generalized to the general population in the USA. On the other hand, many studies have chosen college students as the study population because of both student diversity and relatively low survey costs (Kendrick and Fullerton, 2004;Wang and Chen, 2004;Kumara and Kang, 2010). Second, although great efforts were made to select representative classes from different disciplines, the classes and respondents in this study were not randomly selected, which may result in some potential problems.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%