2006
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.612812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adverse Impact of Bleeding on Prognosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Abstract: Background-The use of multiple antithrombotic drugs and aggressive invasive strategies has increased the risk of major bleeding in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. It is not known to what extent bleeding determines clinical outcome. Methods and Results-Using Cox proportional-hazards modeling, we examined the association between bleeding and death or ischemic events in 34 146 patients with ACS enrolled in the Organization to Assess Ischemic Syndromes and the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

28
718
6
34

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,209 publications
(793 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
28
718
6
34
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of combination anticoagulant therapies and invasive procedures also carries an increased risk of bleeding, which has been shown to be linked with both short-and long-term mortality in patients with ACS. 2,3 Although the recognition and evaluation of bleeding complications may seem intuitive, clinical trials and registries of patients with ACS have used different scales to classify the severity of bleeding, making cross-study comparisons difficult. Many trials also have used more than one scale, potentially confounding the assessment of the safety of various anticoagulant therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of combination anticoagulant therapies and invasive procedures also carries an increased risk of bleeding, which has been shown to be linked with both short-and long-term mortality in patients with ACS. 2,3 Although the recognition and evaluation of bleeding complications may seem intuitive, clinical trials and registries of patients with ACS have used different scales to classify the severity of bleeding, making cross-study comparisons difficult. Many trials also have used more than one scale, potentially confounding the assessment of the safety of various anticoagulant therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship is independent of baseline patient characteristics, comorbid conditions, and treatments and also reflects a direct correlation between the severity of bleeding and the risk of the adverse outcome. 4,5,10,11 The adjusted risk of the 30-day mortality, for example, was five times higher in ACS patients with major bleeding compared with those with no bleeding in a recent meta-analysis. 4 Major bleeding was also strongly correlated with the risk for MI or stroke within 30 days in this analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,10,11 The adjusted risk of the 30-day mortality, for example, was five times higher in ACS patients with major bleeding compared with those with no bleeding in a recent meta-analysis. 4 Major bleeding was also strongly correlated with the risk for MI or stroke within 30 days in this analysis. Similar relationships have been found between major bleeding and the 30-day risk of composite ischemia and stent thrombosis; 5 major bleeding is a powerful, independent predictor of 1-year mortality in patients undergoing PCI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations