Advantage of low quality in short life cycle products

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how the configurations of short life cycle, low quality, design and price, influence customer purchase intention in fast fashion and high technology industries in China. Design/methodology/approach The traditional thinking is that products with high quality and low price will win more customers. However, the authors can notice that high quality products usually have high cost. Therefore, it is necessary to do more research on how customers can accept low quality products. The authors take fast fashion products and smart phones as empirical studies, collecting data from customer’s online survey. Based on the methodology of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, the authors analyse the relationship between the factors of short life cycle, low quality, design and price and influence customer purchase intention. Findings The authors find that price is the most important influencing factor. Low price is a strong competitive factor in the market. As to low quality products, low price can be achieved relatively more easily than with high quality products, resulting from relatively poorer raw material or configurations. Hence the connection between quality and price may give an idea to enterprises that customers will accept low quality products with low price. Moreover, according to the research, different generations are equally affected by the low price condition, regardless of customer gender and household income. Research limitations/implications Because the study only focuses on fast fashion and smart phones industries, future work needs to replicate this study with individual data for different industries and with alternative methods to reinforce the confidence in the research. Meanwhile , this research studied mainly the customer perspective, it would be desirable to extend the study to the enterprise perspective and find out the difficulties that limit them in using low quality products to meet market needs. This may revel some cultural differences in purchase behavior among different countries and the discussed industries can be expanded to a larger area. Practical implications The study offers a number of managerial implications. With the rapid changes in people’s aesthetic sense and developing high-tech, it is more and more necessary for companies to think about how to win more customers and earn more profits. Low quality products have advantages as they will lower companies’ costs in many dimensions, improving the speed of supply. It helps firms to take low quality products into consideration and think whether they will influence different aspects of the company assistance firms to get a deeper understanding of customer psychology and make better decisions on their products. Originality/value The paper fills the gap in the research field by exploring how consumer behavior is affected by different conditions.

The Total Factor Productivity of China’s Software Industry and its Promotion Path

“…Ragin (2008) recommends low, moderate, and high solution consistency thresholds of 0.75, 0.80, and 0.85, respectively. Thus, according to recent research, we set the threshold value of solution consistency bigger than 0.80 for the model of antecedent conditions to be useful, and the coverage value should be higher than 0.05 [46], [47], [48]. Our fsQCA of the total factor productivity of the software industry proceeded in the following steps.…”

“…Before data sets are analyzed by fuzzy sets software they must be calibrated, unlike conventional variables [46], [47]. In the current version of fsQCA3.0 software [51], [52], the [35] to select the quartile method to determine the anchor points of conditional variables and outcome variables.…”

Attributes of product advantage and choices for manufacturer–retailer formal governance: the case of new product launch

“…A key reason for these contradictory results may be the varied treatment of new product advantage in different studies. Many studies treat new product advantage as a unidimensional construct (Im et al, 2013;Carmona-Lavado et al, 2020), others focus on a specific attribute of new product advantage (Kim et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2020) and very few attempt to examine multiple dimensions of new product advantage (Story et al, 2014;Jin et al, 2019). Thus, the impact of new product advantage is masked by distinct connotations and the range of the concept.…”

The power of negative publicity on the fast fashion industry

“…Fast fashion customers are aware that companies from which they buy their clothing do not strive for high quality standards (Pookulangara & Shephard, 2013;Sun, Cai, & Shen, 2020).…”