2006
DOI: 10.1080/00420980600831759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advantage and Disadvantage across Australia's Extended Metropolitan Regions: A Typology of Socioeconomic Outcomes

Abstract: New national and international economic and social forces have reshaped national geographies in general and the characteristics of cities in particular, resulting in a range of diverse social and spatial outcomes. These outcomes, which include greater differentiation across, within and between cities has become a feature of the economic and social forces associated with post-Fordist social structures. Taking localities across Australia's metropolitan regions this paper develops a typology of advantage and disa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenon of mega-urbanization has taken place in many Asian countries, including Indonesia Firman, Kombaitan, & Pradono, 2007;Hugo, 2006;Pradono, 1997), China (Leaf, 2002;Lin, 2002;Sit, 2005;Xie, Batty, & Zhao, 2007;Yang, 2005;Zhu, 2000), Vietnam (Leaf, 2002), Malaysia (Wong, 2006), Thailand, Taiwan and the Philippines (Jones et al, 1999), India (Dupont, 2006) and also in Latin America (Aguilar & Ward, 2003) and Africa (Briggs & Mwamfupe, 2000;Simon, McGregor, & Nsiah-Gyabaah, 2004), and even in Australia (Baum, Haynes, Gellecium, & Han, 2006). Mega-urban regions in Asia, however, in many ways seem to be largely disconnected from local economic activities and produce a little in terms of impacts on development for local population, which in turn has resulted in regional disparities.…”
Section: Mega-urbanization In Asiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The phenomenon of mega-urbanization has taken place in many Asian countries, including Indonesia Firman, Kombaitan, & Pradono, 2007;Hugo, 2006;Pradono, 1997), China (Leaf, 2002;Lin, 2002;Sit, 2005;Xie, Batty, & Zhao, 2007;Yang, 2005;Zhu, 2000), Vietnam (Leaf, 2002), Malaysia (Wong, 2006), Thailand, Taiwan and the Philippines (Jones et al, 1999), India (Dupont, 2006) and also in Latin America (Aguilar & Ward, 2003) and Africa (Briggs & Mwamfupe, 2000;Simon, McGregor, & Nsiah-Gyabaah, 2004), and even in Australia (Baum, Haynes, Gellecium, & Han, 2006). Mega-urban regions in Asia, however, in many ways seem to be largely disconnected from local economic activities and produce a little in terms of impacts on development for local population, which in turn has resulted in regional disparities.…”
Section: Mega-urbanization In Asiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Australian examples include the application of cluster analysis in research on regional settlements by Beer and Maude (1995), Baum (2006) and Baum et al (2006). In the US context, cluster analysis has been used in the large-scale categorization of central cities (e.g.…”
Section: Contextualizing Our Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shorthand term for this would be a 'people-based' approach. Several Australian scholarly articles have used typology analysis in operationalizing this conception (see: Baum, 2006;Baum, Haynes, van Gellecum, & Han, 2006;Reynolds & Wulff, 2005). A second notion of 'disadvantaged area' refers to a place which (innately) disadvantages its residents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this change has been related to tourism development and interstate migration (e.g., Mullins 1990;Jones 1986;Stimson and Minnery 1998), which has had strong regional impacts in terms of economic disparities, social polarization and consequent locational advantage and disadvantage for areas and communities (Stimson et al 2001;Baum et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%