2023
DOI: 10.3390/w15142631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing Water Quality Research: K-Nearest Neighbor Coupled with the Improved Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm Model Unveils New Possibilities for Dry Residue Prediction

Abstract: Monitoring stations have been established to combat water pollution, improve the ecosystem, promote human health, and facilitate drinking water production. However, continuous and extensive monitoring of water is costly and time-consuming, resulting in limited datasets and hindering water management research. This study focuses on developing an optimized K-nearest neighbor (KNN) model using the improved grey wolf optimization (I-GWO) algorithm to predict dry residue quantities. The model incorporates 20 physic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This exploration extended further, delving into a myriad of basis functions, including constant, linear, Pure Quadratic, and zero, while meticulously fine-tuning the parameters-Kernel Scale [sigmaM, sigmaF], and sigma-of each kernel function to achieve optimal performance. Amidst this intricate optimization process, the assessment of the model's efficacy hinged upon two pivotal criteria: the coefficient of correlation, a measure of the model's ability to capture underlying trends, and the root mean square error (RMSE), a quantification of the model's predictive accuracy [29,33,34].…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This exploration extended further, delving into a myriad of basis functions, including constant, linear, Pure Quadratic, and zero, while meticulously fine-tuning the parameters-Kernel Scale [sigmaM, sigmaF], and sigma-of each kernel function to achieve optimal performance. Amidst this intricate optimization process, the assessment of the model's efficacy hinged upon two pivotal criteria: the coefficient of correlation, a measure of the model's ability to capture underlying trends, and the root mean square error (RMSE), a quantification of the model's predictive accuracy [29,33,34].…”
Section: Gaussian Process Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, the experimental and predicted values were overlaid on a graph (Figure 8a), enabling a visual comparison to assess their alignment. This graphical representation facilitated the identification of any systematic deviations or patterns in the model's predictions across different phases [33]. Additionally, a second analytical approach was employed, where an error histogram was constructed to visualize the distribution of residuals for each phase (Figure 8b) [28,33].…”
Section: Residual Analysis Of Model Gprmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…and then assigning the object in question to one of these categories (Tahraoui et al, 2023). Recently KNN has been used to predict breast cancer and its performance in such prediction revealed to be accurate at 100%.…”
Section: ____________________________________________________________...mentioning
confidence: 99%