2012
DOI: 10.1002/pad.1629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing the Governance of Cross‐sectoral Policies for Sustainable Development: A Metagovernance Perspective

Abstract: SUMMARY Sustainable Development (SD) and its pillars are well known, and the need for integrating the social, economic and environmental aspects in development is widely accepted. A topic currently gaining momentum is the improvement of the institutional framework, as called for through the ongoing global processes for SD. This study probes into three successful cases of solutions for SD that effectively used metagovernance elements, that is, integrating and fusing different modes of governance. Metagovernance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(Cash et al 2006, Haines-Young and Potschin 2008, IPCC 2014a) Cross-boundary Interactions that occur between administratively and/or politically distinct places to deal with environmental issues such as climate change impacts. (Truong 2011, Baker et al 2012, Nguyen 2012 Cross-sectoral Interactions between government sectors such as health and environment (USFS 2011, Christopoulos et al 2012 distinct boundaries that insulate them from external influences. In relation to governance, systems theory consists of factors such as feedback loops and communication and control mechanisms, as well as allowing for changes in governance paradigms: for example, moving from centrally controlled governments to governance through a variety of techniques and instruments (see Esmark 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Cash et al 2006, Haines-Young and Potschin 2008, IPCC 2014a) Cross-boundary Interactions that occur between administratively and/or politically distinct places to deal with environmental issues such as climate change impacts. (Truong 2011, Baker et al 2012, Nguyen 2012 Cross-sectoral Interactions between government sectors such as health and environment (USFS 2011, Christopoulos et al 2012 distinct boundaries that insulate them from external influences. In relation to governance, systems theory consists of factors such as feedback loops and communication and control mechanisms, as well as allowing for changes in governance paradigms: for example, moving from centrally controlled governments to governance through a variety of techniques and instruments (see Esmark 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this process of institution building must take place both below and above existing national governments. It is for this reason that many see the development of meta-governance as an important mechanism for sustainability issues [97]. In terms of innovation, this approach challenges the assumption that the poor are too poor to eco-innovate.…”
Section: Value-driven Multi-stakeholder Multi-level Governancementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It aims to make network governance, market governance and hierarchical governance work together in a particular way for a particular situation and allows for different governance at different levels. By mapping the needs and by supporting solutions towards context-specific sustainability, this may contribute to reducing the vagueness of the SD concept and the complexity of its implementation [63]. It helps managing plurality with the aim to induce more coherence [64].…”
Section: Key Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A metagovernance view on energy policy could address the potential benefits and costs of each of these approaches instead of letting one (exclusively) dominate. Indeed, sustainable energy programs in Croatia and Mongolia, where market, network and hierarchical mechanisms were combined, have been analyzed as successful [63].…”
Section: Energy Policy (Goal 7)mentioning
confidence: 99%