2020
DOI: 10.1017/iop.2020.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advancing our understanding of successful aging at work: A socioemotional selectivity theory perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, Cubrich and Petruzzelli (2020) argued that Kooij et al's (2020a) interpretation of the process underlying successful ageing at work can be extended by incorporating the concept of future time perspective from the socioemotional selectivity theory (SST; Carstensen, 2006). This is in line with Grote and Pfrombeck's (2020) proposition that people can manage their ageing experiences by self-regulating their levels of (work) uncertainty and thus their future time perspective.…”
Section: Practitioner Pointsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, Cubrich and Petruzzelli (2020) argued that Kooij et al's (2020a) interpretation of the process underlying successful ageing at work can be extended by incorporating the concept of future time perspective from the socioemotional selectivity theory (SST; Carstensen, 2006). This is in line with Grote and Pfrombeck's (2020) proposition that people can manage their ageing experiences by self-regulating their levels of (work) uncertainty and thus their future time perspective.…”
Section: Practitioner Pointsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Second, Cubrich and Petruzzelli (2020) argued that Kooij et al. 's (2020a) interpretation of the process underlying successful ageing at work can be extended by incorporating the concept of future time perspective from the socioemotional selectivity theory (SST; Carstensen, 2006).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 At the same time, these theories are rarely applied to organizational behavior research, socioemotional selection theory is more widely used in organizational behavior research, which plays an important role in understanding the successful aging of older employees. 11 In essence, SAW reflects whether older employees can effectively overcome the related losses caused by age growth (such…”
Section: Socioemotional Selection Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the remaining time in life, chronological age appears to be robustly related to shifts towards more emotionally meaningful goals (Carstensen et al, 2003), in turn affecting individuals' interactions with their environments (e.g., the workplace) (Rudolph et al, 2018). For example, older workers may focus more on the development of social relationships and generativity motives (Kooij & Van de Voorde, 2011), whereas younger workers may be more motivated by career goals and developing more skills and knowledge (Cubrich & Petruzzelli, 2020;Penningroth & Scott, 2012). Due to perceived limitations of time, older workers tend to be more motivated by goals to establish powerful social relationships within the work environment (e.g., Henry et al, 2015) and less so by accomplishment and excellence at work (Kanfer & Ackerman, 2004).…”
Section: Regulation Of Goals and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing goal orientations are also reflected in behavior. Specifically, SST has been applied to explain the motivational process behind the age effects on work-related outcomes and successful aging at work (Cubrich & Petruzzelli, 2020;Ng & Feldman, 2013;Zacher et al, 2018), whereas Ng and Feldman's (2008) meta-analysis also showed stronger organizational citizenship behavior with age . Therefore, through goal regulation, individuals may become progressively more focused on goals that are intrinsically meaningful, in turn yielding positive impacts on work performance.…”
Section: Regulation Of Goals and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%