Abstract:Measurement of collision cross section (CCS), a parameter
reflecting
an ion’s size and shape, alongside high-resolution mass analysis
extends the depth of molecular analysis by providing structural information
beyond molecular mass alone. Although these measurements are most
commonly undertaken using a dedicated ion mobility cell coupled to
a mass spectrometer, alternative methods have emerged to extract CCSs
directly by analysis of the decay rates of either time-domain transient
signals or the FWHM of frequen… Show more
“…This method allows simultaneous analysis of multiple different ions or charge states but may result in modest overestimation of CCS owing to space charge effects between charge states, as previously described. 46 Ion injection time was optimized for each charge state by varying the ion injection time and finding the ion injection time that gave the lowest decay rate. As previously described, having too few or too many ions injected at once may cause artificially inflated decay rates which yield over-estimated CCS values.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously described, having too few or too many ions injected at once may cause artificially inflated decay rates which yield over-estimated CCS values. 37,46 The C-trap gas pressure was set low (0.1 to 1.0 values, corresponding to 8E-11 to 1E-10 mBar measuring using the UHV gauge), which was optimized to provide measurable signal decay for each peak. Ion mobility CCSs were collected using a home-built atmospheric pressure drift tube as previously described.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the proteins in the present study, namely D1T10 (10+ to 21+) and carbonic anhydrase (15+ to 33+), displayed significantly larger CCSs (5,432 to 8,142 Å 2 ) than those measured in our previous studies. 37,46 The differences in CCS values measured by ion mobility and Orbitrap transient decay are plotted as percent differences (CCS%) in with ion mobility CCSs (CCS% values averaging 5% ± 3%). The CCS values of these protein ions span a large range, 3,500 to 8,000 Å 2 .…”
Section: Extending the Mass Range Of Orbitrap Ccs Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those experiments, a wide range selected ion monitoring (SIM) method was employed for measurement of Orbitrap CCS. 46 The wide-SIM method involves Orbitrap CCS measurements of 2-4 abundant charge states at the same time. This method allows simultaneous analysis of multiple different ions or charge states but may result in modest overestimation of CCS owing to space charge effects between charge states, as previously described.…”
The measurement of collision cross sections (CCS) offers supplemental information about sizes and conformations of ions beyond mass analysis alone. We have previously shown that CCSs can be determined directly from the time-domain transient decay of ions in an Orbitrap mass analyzer as ions oscillate around the central electrode and collide with neutral gas, thus removing them from the ion packet. Herein, we develop the soft sphere collision model, thus deviating from prior FT-MS CCS hard sphere model, to determine CCSs as a function of center-of-mass collision energy in the Orbitrap analyzer. With this model, we aim to increase the upper mass limit of CCS measurement for native-like proteins, characterized by low charge states and presumed to be in more compact conformations. We also combine CCS measurements with collision inducing unfolding and MS/MS experiments to monitor protein unfolding and disassembly of protein complexes and measure CCSs of ejected monomers from protein complexes.
“…This method allows simultaneous analysis of multiple different ions or charge states but may result in modest overestimation of CCS owing to space charge effects between charge states, as previously described. 46 Ion injection time was optimized for each charge state by varying the ion injection time and finding the ion injection time that gave the lowest decay rate. As previously described, having too few or too many ions injected at once may cause artificially inflated decay rates which yield over-estimated CCS values.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously described, having too few or too many ions injected at once may cause artificially inflated decay rates which yield over-estimated CCS values. 37,46 The C-trap gas pressure was set low (0.1 to 1.0 values, corresponding to 8E-11 to 1E-10 mBar measuring using the UHV gauge), which was optimized to provide measurable signal decay for each peak. Ion mobility CCSs were collected using a home-built atmospheric pressure drift tube as previously described.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the proteins in the present study, namely D1T10 (10+ to 21+) and carbonic anhydrase (15+ to 33+), displayed significantly larger CCSs (5,432 to 8,142 Å 2 ) than those measured in our previous studies. 37,46 The differences in CCS values measured by ion mobility and Orbitrap transient decay are plotted as percent differences (CCS%) in with ion mobility CCSs (CCS% values averaging 5% ± 3%). The CCS values of these protein ions span a large range, 3,500 to 8,000 Å 2 .…”
Section: Extending the Mass Range Of Orbitrap Ccs Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those experiments, a wide range selected ion monitoring (SIM) method was employed for measurement of Orbitrap CCS. 46 The wide-SIM method involves Orbitrap CCS measurements of 2-4 abundant charge states at the same time. This method allows simultaneous analysis of multiple different ions or charge states but may result in modest overestimation of CCS owing to space charge effects between charge states, as previously described.…”
The measurement of collision cross sections (CCS) offers supplemental information about sizes and conformations of ions beyond mass analysis alone. We have previously shown that CCSs can be determined directly from the time-domain transient decay of ions in an Orbitrap mass analyzer as ions oscillate around the central electrode and collide with neutral gas, thus removing them from the ion packet. Herein, we develop the soft sphere collision model, thus deviating from prior FT-MS CCS hard sphere model, to determine CCSs as a function of center-of-mass collision energy in the Orbitrap analyzer. With this model, we aim to increase the upper mass limit of CCS measurement for native-like proteins, characterized by low charge states and presumed to be in more compact conformations. We also combine CCS measurements with collision inducing unfolding and MS/MS experiments to monitor protein unfolding and disassembly of protein complexes and measure CCSs of ejected monomers from protein complexes.
“…For those experiments, a wide range selected ion monitoring (SIM) method was employed for measurement of Orbitrap CCS. 44 The wide-SIM method involves Orbitrap CCS measurements of 2-4 abundant charge states at the same time. This method allows simultaneous analysis of multiple different ions or charge states but may result in modest overestimation of CCS owing to space charge effects between charge states, as previously described.…”
The measurement of collision cross sections (CCS) offers supplemental information about sizes and conformations of ions beyond mass analysis alone. We have previously shown that CCSs can be determined directly from the time-domain transient decay of ions in an Orbitrap mass analyzer as ions oscillate around the central electrode and collide with neutral gas, thus removing them from the ion packet. Herein, we develop the soft sphere collision model, thus deviating from prior FT-MS CCS hard sphere model, to determine CCSs as a function of center-of-mass collision energy in the Orbitrap analyzer. With this model, we aim to increase the upper mass limit of CCS measurement for native-like proteins, characterized by low charge states and presumed to be in more compact conformations. We also combine CCS measurements with collision inducing unfolding and MS/MS experiments to monitor protein unfolding and disassembly of protein complexes and measure CCSs of ejected monomers from protein complexes.
The measurement of collision cross sections (CCS, σ) offers supplemental information about sizes and conformations of ions beyond mass analysis alone. We have previously shown that CCSs can be determined directly from the time-domain transient decay of ions in an Orbitrap mass analyzer as ions oscillate around the central electrode and collide with neutral gas, thus removing them from the ion packet. Herein, we develop the modified hard collision model, thus deviating from the prior FT-MS hard sphere model, to determine CCSs as a function of center-of-mass collision energy in the Orbitrap analyzer. With this model, we aim to increase the upper mass limit of CCS measurement for native-like proteins, characterized by low charge states and presumed to be in more compact conformations. We also combine CCS measurements with collision induced unfolding and tandem mass spectrometry experiments to monitor protein unfolding and disassembly of protein complexes and measure CCSs of ejected monomers from protein complexes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.