Advancing methodology for scoping reviews: recommendations arising from a scoping literature review (SLR) to inform transformation of children and adolescent mental health services.

Abstract

Background: There is consensus that health services commissioning and clinical practice should be driven by scientific evidence. However, workload pressures, accessibility of peer reviewed publications and skills to find, appraise, and synthesise relevant evidence are often cited as barriers to uptake of research evidence by practitioners and commissioners alike. In recent years a growing requirement for rapid evidence synthesis to inform commissioning decisions about healthcare service delivery and provision of care contributed to an increasing popularity of scoping literature reviews (SLRs). Yet, published guidelines for conducting and reporting SLRs are still relatively scarce. Methods: The exemplar review used as a worked example aimed to provide a readily available, comprehensive, and user-friendly repository of research evidence for local commissioners to help them make evidence-informed decisions about redesigning East of England Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services. In conducting the review, we were broadly guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, however some modifications were made at different stages to better reflect the largely pragmatic objective of this review. This paper compares the methodology used with existing methodological frameworks for scoping studies, to add to the existing knowledge base.Results: We proposed the following advancements to the existing SLR frameworks: (i) Assemble a research team with complementary skills and expertise; (ii); Draw on expertise of external partners, particularly practitioners, decision-makers and commissioners who will be translating findings into practice; (iii) Pre-register the review protocol. Keep a detailed record of all steps and decisions and consider how they would impact on generalisability and utility of review findings; (iv) Use systematic procedures for literature searchers, selection of studies, data extraction and analysis; (v) If feasible, appraise the quality of included evidence; (vi) Be transparent about limitations of findings.Conclusions: Despite some methodological limitations, scoping literature reviews are a useful method of rapidly synthesising a large body of evidence to inform commissioning and transformation of CAMHS. SLRs allow researchers to start with a broader questions, to explore the issue from different perspectives and perhaps find more comprehensive solutions that are not only effective, but also accounted for their feasibility and acceptability to key stakeholders.

Leveraging Administrative Data to Better Understand and Address Child Maltreatment: A Scoping Review of Data Linkage Studies

“…We conducted a scoping review due to its usefulness for both for ‘mapping’ the evidence by examining the extent, range, and nature of research in the area as well as for identifying gaps in the literature (Anderson et al, 2020; Arksey & O’Malley, 2005). We followed Anderson and colleagues’ (2020) recommendations for using systematic procedures for our literature searches, study selection, data extraction, and data analysis.…”

Inclusive curricula for students with severe intellectual disabilities or profound and multiple learning difficulties: a scoping review

“…Scoping reviews are an effective method for researchers to quickly and coherently present an evidence base to inform decision‐making and articulate gaps for future research (Arksey and O'Malley, 2005; Munn et al., 2018). Scoping reviews allow for an iterative analysis process and rapidly map critical concepts within a research area while maintaining academic rigour and coherence (Anderson et al., 2020; Arksey and O'Malley, 2005; Peters et al., 2015). The researchers selected a scoping review due to its efficacy and ability to profile multiple and varied thematic responses to a research question.…”

“…A brief overview of the types of evidence collected and a short discussion on the articles' geographic relevance, aligning with recommendations by Anderson et al. (2020) and Walsh et al. (2019), is included.…”

“…Researchers responded to Anderson et al. (2020) and Walsh et al. (2019) and their recommendation to include a discussion of the evidentiary base.…”

Usability evaluation of mHealth apps for elderly individuals: a scoping review

“…The descriptive analytical method was used in this stage [35]. A data charting form was developed to guide the data extraction.…”