Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment

Abstract

Abstract:The need for integrated methodological framework for sustainability assessment has been widely discussed and is urgent due to increasingly complex environmental system problems. These problems have impacts on ecosystems and human well-being which represent a threat to economic performance of countries and corporations. Integrated assessment crosses issues; spans spatial and temporal scales; looks forward and backward; and incorporates multi-stakeholder inputs. This study aims to develop an integrated methodology by capitalizing the complementary strengths of different methods used by industrial ecologists and biophysical economists. The computational methodology proposed here is systems perspective, integrative, and holistic approach for sustainability assessment which attempts to link basic science and technology to policy formulation. The framework adopts life cycle thinking methods-LCA, LCC, and SLCA; stakeholders analysis supported by multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); and dynamic system modelling. Following Pareto principle, the critical sustainability criteria, indicators and metrics (i.e., hotspots) can be identified and further modelled using system dynamics or agent based modelling and improved by data envelopment analysis (DEA) and sustainability network theory (SNT). The framework is being applied to development of biofuel supply chain networks. The framework can provide new ways of integrating knowledge across the divides between social and natural sciences as well as between critical and problem-solving research. OPEN ACCESSSustainability 2011, 3 470

Selecting Tools for Renewable Energy Analysis in Developing Countries: An Expanded Review

“…However, these methods are challenged by data availability as a result of detailed calculations in each phase of technology lifetime (Halog and Manik, 2011). Therefore, in terms of data requirement, life cycle thinking demands more detailed technical data than the bottom-up model.…”

Development of Manufacturing Sustainability Assessment Using Systems Thinking

“…Several attempts have been made to incorporate systems thinking into sustainability assessment. Halog and Manik [63] developed an integrated methodological framework based on systems thinking by means of system dynamics, agent-based modeling, and network theory. The authors argue that the integrated system modeling method will become a basis for computational-based life cycle sustainability assessment of systems at various organizational levels.…”

Developing a Sustainability Assessment Model to Analyze China’s Municipal Solid Waste Management Enhancement Strategy

“…The quantitative results of LCA, HRA and FCA are used to transfer the quantitative results into the AHP scale, respectively, based on the judgment of the author. A series of pair-wise comparisons of the elements on a scale of 1 to 9 (where 1 represents the equal importance of each element and 9 represents the extreme importance of one element over the other) [25] are used in attribute priorities to three alternatives under three criteria of sustainability. The scale for pair-wise comparison presents in Table 4.…”

“…Since the utility of this model has not been examined by other authors in another context, the SAM needs to be applied in a variety of localities, and further improvements of the SAM can be identified in practice. The SAM is developed as a credible and reliable tool, which is a transformative, life cycle, systems-oriented thinking framework [25] to support the China MSWM enhancement strategy formulation.…”