Advances in MANEMO: Definition of the Problem Domain and the Design of a NEMO-Centric Approach

McCarthy, Ben; Edwards, C.; Dunmore, Martin

doi:10.1109/saint-w.2007.20

Cited by 12 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, local communication can be performed between the NEMOs in the Nested NEMO structure using extended MANET routing protocols. In another scenario, Another approach proposed by [5] when MANEMO provide an efficient Internet connection to the MR's forming a MANET and it is called MANET-centric MANEMO (MCM). In this situation the Nested NEMOs are part of the ad hoc structure by default and the MANET protocol is the one performing the routing.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cooperative Game Based Resource Allocation in Hybrid D2D Cellular Network

Zhang¹,

Lu²

2017

IJFGCN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This can support large scale networks including many applications like: the mesh networks, layer 3 sensor networks, crowd of personal mobile router, and disasterready municipal network [5]. The MANEMO's MR is required to select the best Exit Router toward the Internet.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperative Game Based Resource Allocation in Hybrid D2D Cellular Network

Zhang¹,

Lu²

2017

IJFGCN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is a broad concept illustrated in [3] which also defines that different NEMO and MANET related issues can be addressed within the MANEMO domain. This includes the Pinball Routing problem discussed earlier.…”

Section: B Manet For Nemo (Manemo)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It enables a network-based selection as described in the previous section under sub-section D. For criteria rating, a numerical scale of [1][2][3][4][5] is adapted to apply the relevant importance to each of the criteria of interest according to a static policy. Calculating the criteria weights based on the rating data was implemented using the pairwise comparison method.…”

Section: Gateway Selection Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multihomed Mobile Network Architecture

Alsukayti

Edwards

2015

2015 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IP mobility ensures network reachability and session continuity while IPv6 networks are on the move. In the Network Mobility (NEMO) model, the potential for NEMO Mobile Routers (MRs) to interconnect and extend Internet connectivity allows the formation Nested NEMO networks. With MANEMO, nested MRs can be efficiently interconnected in a tree-based structure with Internet access being maintained via a designated Gateway. However, this only supports single-homed Internet connectivity.With the span of wireless access technologies and the popularity of multi-interfaced devices, multihoming support in this scenario becomes critical. A Nested Mobile Network with heterogeneous available Internet access options would allow better overall network performance and optimal utilisation of available resources. In this paper, we present the Multihomed Mobile Network Architecture (MMNA), a comprehensive multihomed mobility solution. It provides a multihoming management mechanism for Gateway Discovery and Selection on top of a multihomed mobility model integrating different mobility and multihoming protocols. It enables a complex nested multihomed topology to be established with multiple gateways supporting heterogeneous Internet access. The results demonstrate that the proposed solution achieves better overall throughput, load sharing, and link failure recovery.

show abstract

“…Clausen et al [17] used the optimized link state routing (OLSR) protocol to support route optimization, but the scheme does not consider the handoff situation of the MR. McCarthy et al [18,19] introduced the MANEMO concept and identified two key solution areas in the MANEMO problem domain, namely, NEMO-Centric MANEMO (NCM) and MANET-Centric MANEMO (MCM). McCarthy et al [20,21] and Tsukada and Ernst [22] built testbeds for implementing and experimenting with the MANEMO protocols.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

DRO: domain-based route optimization scheme for nested mobile networks

Chuang

Lee

2011

J Wireless Com Network

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The network mobility (NEMO) basic support protocol is designed to support NEMO management, and to ensure communication continuity between nodes in mobile networks. However, in nested mobile networks, NEMO suffers from the pinball routing problem, which results in long packet transmission delays. To solve the problem, we propose a domain-based route optimization (DRO) scheme that incorporates a domain-based network architecture and ad hoc routing protocols for route optimization. DRO also improves the intra-domain handoff performance, reduces the convergence time during route optimization, and avoids the out-of-sequence packet problem. A detailed performance analysis and simulations were conducted to evaluate the scheme. The results demonstrate that DRO outperforms existing mechanisms in terms of packet transmission delay (i.e., better route-optimization), intra-domain handoff latency, convergence time, and packet tunneling overhead.

show abstract

Advances in MANEMO: Definition of the Problem Domain and the Design of a NEMO-Centric Approach

Cited by 12 publications

References 2 publications

Cooperative Game Based Resource Allocation in Hybrid D2D Cellular Network

Cooperative Game Based Resource Allocation in Hybrid D2D Cellular Network

Multihomed Mobile Network Architecture

DRO: domain-based route optimization scheme for nested mobile networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About