“…The advantages of high-κ REOs are their suitable κ values, relatively large band gaps, high conduction band offset, and excellent thermodynamic properties. − Unfortunately, the serious hygroscopicity and high defect states (e.g., oxygen vacancies, hydroxyls, grain boundary states, and interface states) are the main problems for high-performance REOs-based high-κ dielectrics. − Two mechanisms have been proposed to account for the hygroscopic issue of REOs: the intrinsic factor due to the small lattice energy of most REOs and external factors like defects in REOs. − On the anther hand, most REO thin films are fabricated by capital-intensive vacuum-based technologies like atomic layer deposition (ALD), pulsed laser deposition (PLD), molecular beam epitaxy, and metal–organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). − Recently, solution-processed approaches have been pursued due to their simplicity, low cost, easy control of chemical composition/doping, and scalability. − However, compared with vacuum-based approaches, solution-based high-κ REOs usually contain more defects and hence are more hygroscopic, which severely deteriorate the surface morphologies and electrical performance. − Therefore, it is a great challenge to fabricate high-quality high-κ REOs by solution approaches. It should be mentioned that the fabrication of REOs is immature even by using the vacuum-based techniques compared with other well investigated high-κ oxides (e.g., Al 2 O 3 , HfO 2 , and ZrO 2 ). − Several methods including precursor engineering, postannealing treatments, and doping another high-κ dielectric (e.g., Al 2 O 3 , HfO 2 , and ZrO 2 ) have been developed to enhance the high-κ REO performance. − However, relatively high leakage current, low breakdown electric field, frequency-dependent capacitance characteristics, and poor transistor performance are still observed in the reported high-κ REOs. Furthermore, most previous approaches focus on only one kind of REO...…”