2012
DOI: 10.4103/0256-4602.105001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in internal model control technique: A review and future prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afterwards, there came a trend for almost a decade where IMC-PID tuning issues were investigated by different researchers in different aspects, like disturbance rejection of lag dominated systems, H ∞ based optimization, approximating the IMC controller into PID form, design scheme based on specific gain and phase margins, maximum sensitivity functions, tuning rules, etc [14]- [17]. After the brief survey of IMC design scheme, it is found that the existing methods for IMC-PID tuning are mainly employed on first/second-order plus dead time processes [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards, there came a trend for almost a decade where IMC-PID tuning issues were investigated by different researchers in different aspects, like disturbance rejection of lag dominated systems, H ∞ based optimization, approximating the IMC controller into PID form, design scheme based on specific gain and phase margins, maximum sensitivity functions, tuning rules, etc [14]- [17]. After the brief survey of IMC design scheme, it is found that the existing methods for IMC-PID tuning are mainly employed on first/second-order plus dead time processes [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garcia and Morari (1982) introduced IMC it is characterized as a controller where the process model is explicitly an integral part of the controller. The design process of IMC involves factorizing the predictive plant model G M (s) as invertible G M− (s) and noninvertible G M+ (s) parts depicted in Equation (1) by simple factorization or all pass factorization (Horn et al, 1996;Lee et al, 1998;Rivera et al, 1986;Saxena & Yogesh, 2012;Shamsuzzoha & Lee, 2008c). The internal model controller in Equation (2) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IFAC Conference on Advances in PID Control held in Brescia (Italy) during 28-30 March 2012 concluded that there is no perfect alternative to the PID controller at least at the bottom layer in the process industries (Alcántara et al 2013;Shamsuzzoha 2014). The internal model control (IMC) provides a simple structure for assessment and amalgamation of performance of the control system (Saxena and Hote 2012;Morari and Zafiriou 1989;Shamsuzzoha andLee 2007, 2008b). The effectiveness of IMC tuning rules for setpoint and disturbance, and the derived PID controller attracted the attention of the control engineers and industries in the last decade (Shamsuzzoha andLee 2007, 2008b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of IMC tuning rules for setpoint and disturbance, and the derived PID controller attracted the attention of the control engineers and industries in the last decade (Shamsuzzoha andLee 2007, 2008b). The PID controller tuned with IMC tuning rules provides a clear compromise between robustness and performance to model mismatches, and it is accomplished with only one tuning parameter λ (Lee et al 2008;Saxena and Hote 2012;Shamsuzzoha andLee 2007, 2008b;Rivera et al 1986;Horn et al 1996;Gopi Krishna Rao et al 2014a). The PID controller design for IPDT based on IMC principle was first proposed by Chien and Fruehauf (1990) for closed-loop performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%