2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in imprinting strategies for selective virus recognition a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A broad range of markers associated with infectious diseases such as antibiotics [35], lipopolysaccharides [36], nucleotides [37], toxin proteins [38,39], virus [40,41], bacteria [42,43], and fungi [7] cells have been successfully used as templates in synthesizing MIPs/SIPs. Gast et al [12] highlighted synthesis strategies for virus imprinted polymers. Nowadays, double-templates [44,45] and multi-templates [46] methods have been developed, which makes MIPs/SIPs based-biosensors able to detect more target analytes in one complex sample.…”
Section: Preparation Of Mips/sips For Electrochemical Biosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A broad range of markers associated with infectious diseases such as antibiotics [35], lipopolysaccharides [36], nucleotides [37], toxin proteins [38,39], virus [40,41], bacteria [42,43], and fungi [7] cells have been successfully used as templates in synthesizing MIPs/SIPs. Gast et al [12] highlighted synthesis strategies for virus imprinted polymers. Nowadays, double-templates [44,45] and multi-templates [46] methods have been developed, which makes MIPs/SIPs based-biosensors able to detect more target analytes in one complex sample.…”
Section: Preparation Of Mips/sips For Electrochemical Biosensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this review, current trends in the development of MIPs/SIPs based electrochemical biosensors for rapid assessment of the infectious diseases, as well as future research directions are comprehensively summarized and discussed. Virus-imprinted polymers (VIPs) [12] for virus detection and cell-imprinted polymers (CIPs) [13] for bacteria detection are highlighted ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the methods used to measure the binding properties and binding models used for both aptamers and MIPs are completely different [35][36][37]. A reverse in binding performance is seen as we increase the size of the target molecule, whereby the binding affinities for aptamers generally increase while MIPs start to suffer from performance issues in terms of specificity, due to the lack of compatible monomers and increased chances of non-specific binding [38,39]. This non-specific binding is due to the large surface area available around the MIP material, which can act as sites for non-specific interactions with the sample matrix and structurally related analytes and the lack of accessibility on the MIP surface for larger templates, such as cells and proteins.…”
Section: The Development Of Aptamers and Mipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major environmental viruses are known to be hepatitis A and E viruses, norovirus, astrovirus, and rotavirus [97,110]. Virus imprinting has shown very promising outcomes for the diagnosis of virus-associated diseases [38]. However, the application of aptasensors for environmental viruses is still in its infancy despite the flourishing outcomes for virus detection using aptamers [111].…”
Section: Virus Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecularly imprinted polymers and their target molecules mimic the recognition mechanism of biological systems such as antibodies/antigens or enzymes/inhibitors in synthetic polymeric structures (Mosbach & Ramström, ). MIPs have been produced to capture a broad range of compounds, from low‐molecular‐weight structures to metal ions (Aslıyüce et al, ), pharmaceuticals, environmental pollutants (Üzek, Sari, Şenel, Denizli, & Merkoçi, ), proteins (Perçin, Idil, & Denizli, ), virus particles (Gast, Sobek, & Mizaikoff, ) and even whole microbial cells (Idil, Hedström, Denizli, & Mattiasson, ). There are applications in both bioseparation and diagnostics (Bereli et al, ; Bereli, Saylan, Uzun, Say, & Denizli, ; Ertürk, Özen, Tümer, Mattiasson, & Denizli, ; Uzun, Say, Ünal, & Denizli, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%