The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/bs.acc.2019.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advances in biomarker detection: Alternative approaches for blood-based biomarker detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The purity of the isolated exosomes can vary due to the presence of contaminating particles, other EVs, viscosity of the sample, the presence of milk proteins, and nucleic acids that are often precipitated alongside MDEs [ 35 37 ]. Density gradient ultracentrifugation (DG-UC), where exosomes are separated based on size, mass, and density in a sucrose or iodixanol gradient, is considered the gold standard for exosome isolations [ 38 ]. However, critical drawbacks of this technique include the requirement of large sample volumes (range of milliliters to liters) [ 39 , 40 ], vehicle damage or exosome aggregation [ 39 , 41 , 42 ] (especially exosomes originating from highly viscous solutions such as milk), standardization issues [ 21 , 43 ], and lipoprotein contamination, where high density lipids (HDLs) will sediment alongside MDEs due to similar densities [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purity of the isolated exosomes can vary due to the presence of contaminating particles, other EVs, viscosity of the sample, the presence of milk proteins, and nucleic acids that are often precipitated alongside MDEs [ 35 37 ]. Density gradient ultracentrifugation (DG-UC), where exosomes are separated based on size, mass, and density in a sucrose or iodixanol gradient, is considered the gold standard for exosome isolations [ 38 ]. However, critical drawbacks of this technique include the requirement of large sample volumes (range of milliliters to liters) [ 39 , 40 ], vehicle damage or exosome aggregation [ 39 , 41 , 42 ] (especially exosomes originating from highly viscous solutions such as milk), standardization issues [ 21 , 43 ], and lipoprotein contamination, where high density lipids (HDLs) will sediment alongside MDEs due to similar densities [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in 1959, Seal, observing that red blood cells and white blood cells have higher specific gravities (1.092 and 1.065, respectively) compared to cancer cells (1.056), exploited these differences to separate them using one of the first density-based techniques involving silicone floatation [ 51 ] . To date, it is possible to count on different density gradient media, such as Ficoll®, a synthetic polymer formed by copolymerization of sucrose and epichlorohydrin [ 12 ] , Ficoll-Paque® and Lymphoprep®, both composed of polysaccharides and diatrizoate [ 52 ] , and Percoll®, consisting in a colloidal silica particle suspension [ 45 ] . All these media basically allow the separation of CTCs from blood cells through centrifugation.…”
Section: Ctc Cultures: a Strenuous Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde (CICS-UBI), Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. 4 Centro Hospitalar Cova da Beira, E.P.E, Covilhã, Portugal. 5 Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationunclassified
“…Thus, to avoid missing out some critical candidates, a highly demanding sample processing is required to reduce the complexity of the samples. Also, large cohorts are needed to perform biomarker discovery directly from human samples in order to overcome the large biological variability intrinsic of these samples [1][2][3][4]. All these aspects combined result in a very challenging analysis, which may justify, in part, the low reproducibility and success of biomarker discovery studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%