Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Tuning for Ziegler-Nichols Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can find recent literature in which new tuning methods, developed by Waller and Nygardas (WN) [13] and Chien, Chung, Chen, and Chuang (CCCC) [17] for inverse response systems, are compared to traditional methods; see for instance [60,61]. Additionally, one can find several works that compare the performance with one of the most traditional tuning methods developed by Ziegler and Nichols (ZN) [14] during the 1940s, see for instance [62][63][64] where %TO: percentage of transmitter output, %CO: percentage of controller output, UT: units of time. A central composite experimental design, as explained in the scaling section, was implemented in order to select a set of parameters of the process' transfer function to test the performance and robustness of the closed-loop, for each controller, over a wide range of values.…”
Section: Discussion On Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can find recent literature in which new tuning methods, developed by Waller and Nygardas (WN) [13] and Chien, Chung, Chen, and Chuang (CCCC) [17] for inverse response systems, are compared to traditional methods; see for instance [60,61]. Additionally, one can find several works that compare the performance with one of the most traditional tuning methods developed by Ziegler and Nichols (ZN) [14] during the 1940s, see for instance [62][63][64] where %TO: percentage of transmitter output, %CO: percentage of controller output, UT: units of time. A central composite experimental design, as explained in the scaling section, was implemented in order to select a set of parameters of the process' transfer function to test the performance and robustness of the closed-loop, for each controller, over a wide range of values.…”
Section: Discussion On Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PID controller is tuned using an algorithm by a combination of the Z-N method and APSO. The PID parameters are obtained from Z-N, which is the classical observation method of tuning [31]. The output is set as the initial value, which provides the searching space to avoid local optima [32].…”
Section: Optimization Of the Controller's Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they must be optimally tuned to obtain an acceptable closed loop system response. Conventional tuning methods such as Ziegler-Nichols [11], [12], Yuwana-Seborg [13], and Cohen-Coon [14] have already been used by most of the researchers for many years. However, they have some drawbacks, such as requiring numerical computations and more time to carry out trial and * Corresponding author/Yazışılan Yazar error procedures while finding the optimized PID parameters [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%