2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-4356(04)00150-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced surface-recording techniques for computer-assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery

Abstract: Markerless recording of patients based on natural anatomical surfaces makes planning of computer-assisted surgery much easier, as it is not necessary to place and measure markers. Recording of the surgical site with a laser scan takes the place of conventional marker-based recording. We have used auricles as well as the maxilla and mandible as reproducible surfaces. The geometric congruence of the laser scanned surface with the corresponding surface in the computed tomographs data-set and the applied intraoper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, noninvasive external referencing techniques have been established in neurosurgery and ear, nose, and throat surgery [14]. Experimental attempts to use noninvasive array systems for cranial interventions consisting of a small base plate fixated by an attachment headband around the distal thigh of cadavers revealed substantial translational and rotational movements during minor manipulations of the affected lower extremity [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, noninvasive external referencing techniques have been established in neurosurgery and ear, nose, and throat surgery [14]. Experimental attempts to use noninvasive array systems for cranial interventions consisting of a small base plate fixated by an attachment headband around the distal thigh of cadavers revealed substantial translational and rotational movements during minor manipulations of the affected lower extremity [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, bony fixation of a reference marker array in the femur during these navigation procedures theoretically involves the risk of infection at the pin implantation site and/or the risk of iatrogenic femoral stress fractures and/or may loosen in osteoporotic bone [8,11,13,16,29]. Noninvasive registration techniques with external reference markers are used predominantly in navigated procedures around the cranium [14], but also have been used in total joint arthroplasty [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, noninvasive external referencing techniques have been clinically established in neurosurgery, and ear, nose, and throat surgery 7, 10, 11. Earlier studies concerning noninvasive referencing of peripheral extremities in traumatology used immobilization casts or splints applied to the extremity for pre‐ or intraoperative CT imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of potential complications have been reported, including pin site infections, soft tissue morbidity, and stress fractures 4–6. So far, noninvasive registration techniques with external reference markers are predominantly used in navigated procedures around the cranium 7. While the rigid skull and the thin soft tissue cover permit the use of pinless external referencing devices, no regular clinical application of pinless femoral reference arrays has been reported in orthopedic surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In neurosurgery, craniomaxillofacial, and ENT surgery, the rigid skull and the thin soft tissue cover permit accurate noninvasive external referencing. 10,12 This study evaluated the use of an existing external referencing system for the head on navigated procedures of the lower extremities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%