The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04974-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Semiconductor Materials and Devices—Outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas Polvino et al (2008) reported that the exposure induced permanent structural damage to the crystal structure, Mastropietro et al (2013) have shown that the intense radiation only damages the Si /Si-on-insulator interface but not the crystalline Si structure. Aside from SiC and GaN which potentially offer radiation-hard alternatives to silicon devices (Sellin & Vaitkus, 2006), bulk or layered GaAs is known to be a very radiation-hard material suitable for X-ray detectors (Claeys & Simoen, 2002;Lioliou & Barnett, 2016;Smolyanskiy et al, 2018). Here, we show that GaAs/ (In,Ga)As/GaAs core-shell NWs may also be affected by X-ray-induced radiation damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Whereas Polvino et al (2008) reported that the exposure induced permanent structural damage to the crystal structure, Mastropietro et al (2013) have shown that the intense radiation only damages the Si /Si-on-insulator interface but not the crystalline Si structure. Aside from SiC and GaN which potentially offer radiation-hard alternatives to silicon devices (Sellin & Vaitkus, 2006), bulk or layered GaAs is known to be a very radiation-hard material suitable for X-ray detectors (Claeys & Simoen, 2002;Lioliou & Barnett, 2016;Smolyanskiy et al, 2018). Here, we show that GaAs/ (In,Ga)As/GaAs core-shell NWs may also be affected by X-ray-induced radiation damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The choice of the post-implantation annealing temperature T a = 598 K as the optimum temperature due to the selection of Si-B3-type radiation defects with the highest concentration, which introduce additional energy levels in the semiconductor's band gap, follows from the analysis of the literature [39] and previous studies [40]. In order to confirm this fact, the G = f(T p ) dependencies were developed for individual samples and four different annealing temperatures T a (Figures 3a, 4a and 5a), from which it can be seen that for each of the implantation doses used, local maxima and characteristic inflection of the G = f(T p ) curve occur for temperature T a = 598 K. Figures 3b, 4b and 5b show analogous G = f(T p ) relationships for individual samples, for the previously selected post-implantation annealing temperature T a = 598 K and different frequencies f. In this case, we also observe local conductance maxima whose location shifts towards higher sample temperatures T p with increasing frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for most defects, such as the Si C -SF center, these cross sections are of the order of the lattice constant (∼10 −15 cm 2 ). 33,34 The lifetimes of the excited and shelving states can significantly vary among different color centers. However, in the steady-state, they determine only the maximum achievable SPEL rate given by R max = τ nr /[τ r (τ s + τ nr )].…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%