2020
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2020.1717477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced methods for activated carbon from agriculture wastes; a comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the higher cost of activated carbon production [ 22 ], its usage as a contaminant adsorbent is still popular due to its practicality. Compared to other remedial techniques, the adsorption process was chosen due to the lower operational cost, easier application and reduced waste [ 28 ]. Finding a low-cost precursor for activated carbon production is a must, most probably from waste materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the higher cost of activated carbon production [ 22 ], its usage as a contaminant adsorbent is still popular due to its practicality. Compared to other remedial techniques, the adsorption process was chosen due to the lower operational cost, easier application and reduced waste [ 28 ]. Finding a low-cost precursor for activated carbon production is a must, most probably from waste materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned heavy metals were essentials in some perspective ways (Yunus et al, 2020). However, the toxicity of some essential heavy metals, such as copper (Cu), was also reported.…”
Section: Effect Of Heavy Metals Toward Humans Plants and Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the adsorptive properties of SC are naturally significantly low, it becomes of utmost importance to test the most suitable adsorption isotherm to assess the success of its real application for contaminant removal. Various adsorption models developed by two parameters or three parameters have been described [ 123 ]. For the removal of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu) from aqueous solution, adsorption data fitted better to the Langmuir isotherm than the Freundlich isotherm as the coefficients of correlation were (R 2 = 0.992, 0.956, R 2 = 0.868, 0.715), respectively [ 121 ].…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%