2016
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced In vivo Use of CRISPR/Cas9 and Anti-sense DNA Inhibition for Gene Manipulation in the Brain

Abstract: Gene editing tools are essential for uncovering how genes mediate normal brain–behavior relationships and contribute to neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Recent progress in gene editing technology now allows neuroscientists unprecedented access to edit the genome efficiently. Although many important tools have been developed, here we focus on approaches that allow for rapid gene editing in the adult nervous system, particularly CRISPR/Cas9 and anti-sense nucleotide-based techniques. CRISPR/Cas9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(156 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given such advances in gene targeting, the method originally developed by the three pioneering Nobel Laureates, Capecchi, Smithies and Evans, will likely withstand the test of times. Nevertheless, it is also likely that in the future new recombinant DNA methods, including the TALEN (transcription activator-like effector nuclease) and the Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) gene targeting systems ( Boettcher and McManus, 2015 ; Pu et al, 2015 ; also see current special topic paper by Walters et al, 2016 ), will gain increasingly strong roles in the genetic analysis of brain function and behavior. One reason why these newly developed techniques may become more frequently used at the expense of classical gene targeting is that even though true-and-tried, the ES cell-based gene targeting method is more time consuming, labor intensive and expensive than many of the recently developed genome editing tools.…”
Section: Will Homologous Recombination-based Gene Targeting Survive Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given such advances in gene targeting, the method originally developed by the three pioneering Nobel Laureates, Capecchi, Smithies and Evans, will likely withstand the test of times. Nevertheless, it is also likely that in the future new recombinant DNA methods, including the TALEN (transcription activator-like effector nuclease) and the Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) gene targeting systems ( Boettcher and McManus, 2015 ; Pu et al, 2015 ; also see current special topic paper by Walters et al, 2016 ), will gain increasingly strong roles in the genetic analysis of brain function and behavior. One reason why these newly developed techniques may become more frequently used at the expense of classical gene targeting is that even though true-and-tried, the ES cell-based gene targeting method is more time consuming, labor intensive and expensive than many of the recently developed genome editing tools.…”
Section: Will Homologous Recombination-based Gene Targeting Survive Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to recent improvements, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has become highly efficient and specific (Zhang et al, 2014), and it has recently been employed to produce PRNP knockout mouse epithelial NMuMG cells (Mehrabian et al, 2014). Important challenges remain in the clinical application of CRISPR/Cas9 and other gene-editing technologies to target neuronal proteins, related to their delivery (Walters et al, 2015). The use of viral carriers, such as lentiviral, adenoviral or adeno-associated vectors, presents technical and theoretical challenges, mainly due to the difficulty of precisely controlling expression, and avoiding unwanted insertional mutagenesis effects.…”
Section: / 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new gene editing methods (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9) have already been used to manipulate multiple genes at once (Shalem et al, 2015;Walters et al, 2015), and such use seems likely to spread. Propositions about the role of specific genetically modulated pathways could then be fairly powerfully tested.…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%