2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.01.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced control approaches for combined cooling/antisolvent crystallization in continuous mixed suspension mixed product removal cascade crystallizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, researchers have focused on improving the mixing efficiency by using various feed modes, the antisolvent‐solution contact approach, additional physical fields (electric, magnetic, etc. ), and novel feeding devices and crystallizers . However, because antisolvent transfer is based on the droplet or capillary mixing approach, the fundamental mixing mechanism is still limited by the mixing devices with a millimeter or submillimeter scale (10 −4 ‐10 −3 m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, researchers have focused on improving the mixing efficiency by using various feed modes, the antisolvent‐solution contact approach, additional physical fields (electric, magnetic, etc. ), and novel feeding devices and crystallizers . However, because antisolvent transfer is based on the droplet or capillary mixing approach, the fundamental mixing mechanism is still limited by the mixing devices with a millimeter or submillimeter scale (10 −4 ‐10 −3 m).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous MSMPR crystallization is a nonlinear distributed-parameter system, therefore, control design is a challenging task. Different strategies have been proposed including robust control [9][10][11], C-control [12], decentralized PID, nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) [13], and direct nucleation control [14]. A Lyapunov-function-based approach called discrepancy-based control was presented in [15] and generalized to particle systems in [16].…”
Section: Discrepancy-based Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,[32][33][34] In addition, there are several recent reports about the optimization of the multistage MSMPR crystallizer. 8,9,[35][36][37] However, no general analysis of the effects of various crystallization kinetic parameters on the effective operating strategy for the crystallization system has been carried out. This kind of analysis is important because it can be a guideline for the appropriate design and operation of a continuous multistage MSMPR crystallization process when the crystallization kinetic data are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%