2021
DOI: 10.53637/pjps3138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adtech and Children’s Data Rights

Abstract: The advertising technology industry, known as ‘adtech’, is a complicated network of organisations and individuals that collect, aggregate and deal with large amounts of personal data. As children engage with digital networks for many aspects of their lives, they are increasingly exposed to adtech practices. Depending on their age, children may have less knowledge of the commercial digital environment and less maturity in their decision-making processes than adults have. Their limited resilience in the face of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by recent specialised scholarly analyses [1], in the perimeter of the obligations incumbent on professionals / data controllers to transparently inform data subjects, three cardinal rules can be distinguished: (I) the resecting of the exigencies derived from principle of informational amplitude, which requires that the information provided to the data subjects is expected to be complete, without omitting essential information; (ii) the principle of intelligibility of information, which refers to resorting to a comprehensible form of providing informative details; (iii) the principle of loyalty, from which the condition of correctness of the provided information follows, as an element of contractual loyalty [2], [3]. This 'tripod' on which the obligation to inform the data subjects is placed remains in the centre of the discussions on the legitimacy of the children's data collecting and processing, as an essential pillar which can be found, with prominent outlines also in the matter of data collecting and processing [4], [5]. On the other versant of the discussions, the inferior capacity of younger children in terms of deciding on their personal data exposure generated privacy concerns, which have led the European legislator to establish a limited timeframe of a minimum of 13 years-old for the child's expressing consent to personal data processing [2], [5].…”
Section: Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by recent specialised scholarly analyses [1], in the perimeter of the obligations incumbent on professionals / data controllers to transparently inform data subjects, three cardinal rules can be distinguished: (I) the resecting of the exigencies derived from principle of informational amplitude, which requires that the information provided to the data subjects is expected to be complete, without omitting essential information; (ii) the principle of intelligibility of information, which refers to resorting to a comprehensible form of providing informative details; (iii) the principle of loyalty, from which the condition of correctness of the provided information follows, as an element of contractual loyalty [2], [3]. This 'tripod' on which the obligation to inform the data subjects is placed remains in the centre of the discussions on the legitimacy of the children's data collecting and processing, as an essential pillar which can be found, with prominent outlines also in the matter of data collecting and processing [4], [5]. On the other versant of the discussions, the inferior capacity of younger children in terms of deciding on their personal data exposure generated privacy concerns, which have led the European legislator to establish a limited timeframe of a minimum of 13 years-old for the child's expressing consent to personal data processing [2], [5].…”
Section: Introductory Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%