2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-019-0987-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorptive removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution unto groundnut shell

Abstract: Chromium present in high levels in water poses a serious problem in many places around the world, sometimes in relation to natural sources and in other cases to anthropogenic ones. Adsorption process using natural materials is among the most effective techniques for removing many heavy metal ions from different types of water sources. In the present study, groundnut shell was used as a nonconventional adsorbent for effective removal of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions using batch experiments. The adsorption… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slow increase at the later stage as reflected by small increase in adsorption capacity was ascribed to low number of unoccupied sites and adsorbate molecules occupy the remaining vacant sites slowly due to repulsive forces between adsorbate molecules of the solid and liquid phases. Similar results have been reported for adsorption of CV dye on sawdust activated carbon [32], MG dye on biochar [33] and Cr(VI) on groundnut shell [34].…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Timesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The slow increase at the later stage as reflected by small increase in adsorption capacity was ascribed to low number of unoccupied sites and adsorbate molecules occupy the remaining vacant sites slowly due to repulsive forces between adsorbate molecules of the solid and liquid phases. Similar results have been reported for adsorption of CV dye on sawdust activated carbon [32], MG dye on biochar [33] and Cr(VI) on groundnut shell [34].…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Timesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consequently, the probability of collision between the adsorbate and adsorbent active sites increase and thus leading to higher Cr(VI) uptake [39,40]. These observations are consistent with previous reports [41,42].…”
Section: Influence Of Initial Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This could be attributed by the saturation of adsorption sites. However, rapid chromium adsorption in the initial stage is due to the high initial Cr(VI) concentration on the adsorbate and the corresponding available vacant sites on the clay mineral adsorbent materials [16,44,45]. The final adsorption capacities of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using NC and MC600 are 7.0 and 10.0 mg/g, respectively.…”
Section: Chromium Adsorption Related To Contact Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, by increasing the solution pH, the deprotonation mechanism of the active groups is occurred and this attributed to a decrease in the number of positively charged sites on the clay adsorbent. Hence, Cr(VI) adsorption from aqueous solution is preferred due to the increasing of the electrostatic attractive interactions between the clay surface and the chromium ions in the solution [1,44]. However, further increase in the solution pH that results in a reduction in the chromium uptake.…”
Section: 233mentioning
confidence: 99%