2018
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2018.22756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption studies on treatment of textile wastewater using low-cost adsorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the beginning, the initial amount of available active sites can be freely adsorbed, resulting in a rapid increase in the Ni(II) removal rate. However, as the adsorption site becomes gradually occupied by Ni(II), the rate of removal decreases and the adsorption tends to be balanced [35]. Indeed, we have demonstrated here that 75 min is a balance time that is logically and economically advantageous.…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Time On Twgac and Ngacmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the beginning, the initial amount of available active sites can be freely adsorbed, resulting in a rapid increase in the Ni(II) removal rate. However, as the adsorption site becomes gradually occupied by Ni(II), the rate of removal decreases and the adsorption tends to be balanced [35]. Indeed, we have demonstrated here that 75 min is a balance time that is logically and economically advantageous.…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Time On Twgac and Ngacmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…was carried out at varying adsorbent dose (0.2-1 gm/100 ml) while pH (6) was kept constant for Cr. The increase in adsorbent dosage leads to an increase of metal removal that was observed and was shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Influence Of Adsorbent Dosage Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various processes of sources of chromium and lead metals are mining, tanning, cement, textile and dyeing, electroplating industries, steel, photographic material, and paints. Heavy metals removed from wastewater using various technologies like ion exchange process, flocculation, precipitation process, membrane filtration, RO, and phytoremediation are the conventional methods, and the merits and demerits of each method have extensively reviewed [6,7]. The conventional process has demerits such as increasing the disposal problems due to the large amount sludge production, and treated wastewater is contaminated and very difficult to treat the toxic industrial wastewater because of high biological demand, total solids, and huge amount of weakly biodegradable and toxic matters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%