2012
DOI: 10.1021/ef300154h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Novel Nonionic Surfactant and Particles Mixture in Carbonates: Enhanced Oil Recovery Implication

Abstract: Over 40% of the current world conventional oil production comes from carbonate reservoirs, dominantly mature and declining giant oilfields. After primary and secondary oil production stages using tertiary oil production methods as part of an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) scheme is inevitable. Surfactant flooding aims at reducing the mobility ratio through lowering the interfacial tension between oil and water and mobilizing the residual oil. This article highlights the adsorption equilibrium of the combination o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
107
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
107
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be mentioned here that to determine the amount of adsorption loss of the addressed ionic surfactant onto the reservoir rock samples, a batch test was used. Due to this fact, the weight of the crushed rock samples and the volume of the aqueous solution with different surfactant concentrations should be consistent for all the adsorption experiments as illustrated in Ahmadi and Shadizadeh (2012, 2013a, c, 2015. Two more crucial points should be mentioned: First, the equilibrium time of adsorption was about 24 h, so adsorption experiments were conducted for 24 h. Second, the mass ratio of the surfactant solution to the crushed rock was 5:1.…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It should be mentioned here that to determine the amount of adsorption loss of the addressed ionic surfactant onto the reservoir rock samples, a batch test was used. Due to this fact, the weight of the crushed rock samples and the volume of the aqueous solution with different surfactant concentrations should be consistent for all the adsorption experiments as illustrated in Ahmadi and Shadizadeh (2012, 2013a, c, 2015. Two more crucial points should be mentioned: First, the equilibrium time of adsorption was about 24 h, so adsorption experiments were conducted for 24 h. Second, the mass ratio of the surfactant solution to the crushed rock was 5:1.…”
Section: Adsorption Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To evaluate adsorption of the ionic surfactant in the presence of different silica nanoparticles, two core samples were crushed using a jaw crusher and then passed through specific sieves (50-70 mesh size) for repeatability of the experiments and to double check our adsorption experiments (Salari et al 2011;Ahmadi and Shadizadeh 2012, 2013a, b, c, 2015Ahmadi et al 2014;Zendehboudi et al 2013). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted to analyze the phase composition of the core samples, and the results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Core and Crushed Core Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At specific concentration, the micelle will appear with its lowest size leads to lower IFT at optimum. The concentration, where IFT is minimum is considered to be critical micelle concentration of that surfactant can be analyzed by conductivity [13].…”
Section: Critical Micelle Concentration Testmentioning
confidence: 99%