1999
DOI: 10.1021/la990457q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Nitrogen in Carbon Nanotube Arrays

Abstract: Grand canonical Monte Carlo molecular simulations have been carried out for adsorption of nitrogen at 77 K on square arrays of open and closed single-wall carbon nanotubes with diameters of 6-30 Å and nanotube separations of 4-30 Å. Exohedral spaces for arrays of closed nanotubes with small tube separations are microporous. For large separations, two-stage adsorption occurs, corresponding to monolayer formation followed by a condensation step. Filling of the exohedral space is dominated by geometrical factors … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, on experimental data we do not observe a plateau around saturation and in fact on simulated data this plateau also vanishes on isotherms obtained for large distances between tubes. It is interesting that this plateau is usually observed on nitrogen isotherms simulated in different simulation boxes for example for square array of tubes (Yin et al 1999). Summing up, in our opinion the experimental data obtained for the studied systems show that adsorption process can be dominated by adsorption on those fragments of bundles, where the tubes are at relatively large distances and they behave almost independently.…”
Section: Surface Areas Of Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, on experimental data we do not observe a plateau around saturation and in fact on simulated data this plateau also vanishes on isotherms obtained for large distances between tubes. It is interesting that this plateau is usually observed on nitrogen isotherms simulated in different simulation boxes for example for square array of tubes (Yin et al 1999). Summing up, in our opinion the experimental data obtained for the studied systems show that adsorption process can be dominated by adsorption on those fragments of bundles, where the tubes are at relatively large distances and they behave almost independently.…”
Section: Surface Areas Of Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The probability of attempts of changing a system state by creation, annihilation, and rotation and displacement (the latter one is connected with the change in angular orientation) were equal to: 1/3, 1/3, 1/6 and 1/6. Simulation studies of nitrogen adsorption in carbon nanotubes can be performed assuming a spherical model (Alain et al 2000;Kotsalis et al 2004;Kowalczyk et al 2005;Maddox and Gubbins 1995;Ohba and Kaneko 2002;Ohba et al 2007;Wongkoblap et al 2009;Yin et al 1999) but if nitrogen molecules are confined in nanotubes the assumed shape of molecules is important and nitrogen should be modeled as a diatomic molecule (Arab et al 2004;Arora et al 2004;Arora and Sandler 2005, 2007a, 2007bJiang and Sandler 2003;Khan and Ayappa 1998;Müller 2008;Paredes et al 2003;Wongkoblap et al 2009;Zhang et al 2008). To test the importance of molecular shape, both potential models (spherical and diatomic) were used by Wongkoblap et al (2009) in computer simulation.…”
Section: Gcmc Simulations Of Adsorption On Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since their discovery in 1991 [1], carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and carbon nanofibers (CNFs) have attracted a deal of interests due to their own unique characteristics and potential applications such as separation, gas sensing, catalyst support, energy storage, and environmental protection [4][5][6]. On the other hand, graphitic carbon nanofibers (GCNFs) represent a class of nanostructured carbon fibers with atomic structures uniquely different from that of carbon nanotubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%