2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00204-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adsorption of Cr(VI) on activated rice husk carbon and activated alumina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
118
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
118
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The average bulk density was 377.24 kg m -3 for the long grain rice husk, 331.59 kg m −3 for the short grain rice husk, 344.97 kg m −3 for the cascara de arroz rice husk and 380.54 kg m −3 for the japonica rice husk. These values are similar to the value of 348.8 kg m −3 reported by Velez et al (2009) for the rice husk from Colombia, the value of 353 kg m -3 reported by Bishnoi et al (2004) for the rice husk from India and are within the range of 100-400 kg m −3 reported by Sridhar et al (1996) for the rice husk from India. reported by Yuan et al (2012) for the rice straw from China and the value of 182 kg m −3 reported by Chiueh et al (2012) for the rice straw from Taiwan and lower than the value of 227 kg m −3 reported by Kadam et al (2000) for the rice straw from USA.…”
Section: Rice Huskssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The average bulk density was 377.24 kg m -3 for the long grain rice husk, 331.59 kg m −3 for the short grain rice husk, 344.97 kg m −3 for the cascara de arroz rice husk and 380.54 kg m −3 for the japonica rice husk. These values are similar to the value of 348.8 kg m −3 reported by Velez et al (2009) for the rice husk from Colombia, the value of 353 kg m -3 reported by Bishnoi et al (2004) for the rice husk from India and are within the range of 100-400 kg m −3 reported by Sridhar et al (1996) for the rice husk from India. reported by Yuan et al (2012) for the rice straw from China and the value of 182 kg m −3 reported by Chiueh et al (2012) for the rice straw from Taiwan and lower than the value of 227 kg m −3 reported by Kadam et al (2000) for the rice straw from USA.…”
Section: Rice Huskssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies on the removal of Cr(VI) using activated carbons produced from coconut shells [7], clays [8], wheat bran [9], rice husk [10], tyres and sawdust [11], etc. have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Removal of dyes and their intermediates from effluents is a serious environmental issue as they are xenobiotic in nature and found to be recalcitrant to biodegradation (Garg et al, 2004;Imran et al, 2014). Problem becomes more complex with the presence of other contaminants like chromium (Cr) compounds in the wastewater along with azo dyes (Bishnoi et al, 2004;Mahmood et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%